D-Allulose Taste-Modifying Mixture for Bitter Aftertaste Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food and beverage products with reduced high caloric sugar content face challenges such as altered sweetness profiles, bitter after-tastes, and off-flavors, which conventional sweeteners and sugar substitutes fail to address effectively, while natural alternatives are difficult to assess toxicologically and require complex purification.

Innovation Solution

A mixture comprising D-allulose and taste-modifying compounds like hesperetin, hesperetindihydrochalcone, phloretin, alpha-glycosyl rubusosides, balansines, phyllodulcin, eriodictyol, and matairesinol, which enhance sweetness impact, improve mouthfeel, and reduce lingering sweetness and off-tastes, while maintaining a similar sweetness profile to high caloric sugars.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If high caloric sugar content is reduced in food or beverage products, then health benefits are improved (lower calorie intake, reduced blood sugar rise, fewer fat deposits), but sweetness profile and taste quality deteriorate (altered sweetness, bitter after-tastes, off-flavors)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehealth risks from high caloric sugarVSAvoidtaste quality and sweetness profile
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces taste-modifying compounds (such as cyclotitrin, phyllodulcin, and other sweet taste-enhancing substances) as intermediary agents that mediate between the reduced sugar content and the desired sweetness profile. These compounds selectively enhance sweet taste sensations without contributing to the harmful metabolic effects of high caloric sugars, thereby resolving the contradiction between health benefits and taste quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite sweetening systems that combine multiple components: reduced high caloric sugars, alternative sweeteners (such as allulose, erythritol, or other sugar alcohols), and taste-modifying compounds. This composite approach allows the formulation to achieve both health benefits from reduced sugar and acceptable taste quality through the synergistic effects of the combined components, particularly the sweet taste-enhancing properties of the taste-modifying compounds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional sweeteners are used to replace high caloric sugars, then sweetness is maintained, but additional harmful factors are introduced (bitter after-tastes, astringent flavors, long-lasting sweet aftertaste, heat instability)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesweetness intensityVSAvoidunwanted taste sensations and stability issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the principle of converting harmful factors into benefits by using taste-modifying compounds that specifically target and enhance sweet taste sensations while masking or counteracting the unwanted bitter and astringent after-tastes associated with conventional sweeteners. For example, certain compounds in the mixture can suppress bitter taste receptors while leaving sweet taste receptors activated, thereby converting the harmful bitter aftertaste into a beneficial pure sweet sensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by carefully controlling the concentrations and ratios of different sweeteners and taste-modifying compounds in the formulation. By adjusting these parameters, the patent optimizes the sweetness profile while minimizing unwanted after-tastes and improving heat stability. The specific ratios of taste-modifying compounds to sweeteners are tuned to achieve the desired sensory characteristics and stability properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If natural substances are used to enhance sweetness, then toxicological assessment becomes more difficult and purification requirements increase, but consumer acceptance may improve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer preference for natural ingredientsVSAvoidpurification and toxicological assessment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the complex natural substance into isolated, well-defined chemical compounds with known structures and properties. Rather than using crude natural extracts that require complex purification and toxicological assessment, the patent identifies and utilizes specific taste-modifying compounds (such as individual flavonoids or glycosides) that can be produced through controlled fermentation or extraction processes. This segmentation simplifies both the purification requirements and toxicological assessment while maintaining the natural origin benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250248432A1Mixture comprising d-allulose and taste modifying compounds
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 SYMRISE GMBH & CO KG
  • US20250248432A1 patent drawing
  • US20250248432A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention primarily relates to a mixture comprising or consisting of a) D-allulose and b) a taste modifying compound selected from the group consisting of hesperetin, hersperetindihydrochalcone, phloretin, glycosylated rubusosides, balansines, phyllodulcin, eriodictyol, homoeriodictyol, matairesinol, and mixtures thereof. A further aspect of the present invention relates to a food or beverage product comprising a mixture according to the present invention.