D-Shaped Food Product Slicing for Better Cutting Zone Use

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing food product slicing methods are inefficient due to the unoccupied space in the cutting zone caused by food products with conventional cross-sections, leading to increased costs and reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

The use of D-shaped food products and a slicing apparatus with D-shaped apertures allows for more efficient slicing by optimizing the use of space within the cutting zone, enabling multiple D-shaped food products to be sliced simultaneously with a cutting element that moves through a defined cutting path.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional cross-sectional shapes (circular, rectangular, or semi-circular) are used for food products, then the slicing operation can be performed with standard equipment, but the amount of food product sliced per blade movement is reduced, leading to lower efficiency and increased costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of food product sliced per blade movementVSAvoidcomplexity of food product shape
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by changing the food product cross-section from traditional symmetric shapes (circular, rectangular, or semi-circular) to an asymmetric D-shape. This asymmetric configuration allows the product to occupy more of the cutting zone aperture, thereby increasing the amount of food sliced per blade movement and improving slicing efficiency without requiring complex manufacturing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements parameter changes by modifying the geometric parameters of the food product cross-section. Specifically, it changes the shape parameters to create a D-shaped profile with one straight side and one curved side, optimizing the configuration to maximize space utilization in the cutting zone while maintaining ease of manufacture through standard molding processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If food products are formed in traditional shapes, then manufacturing processes remain simple and standard, but the space available for cutting is not maximized, resulting in wasted space and increased operational costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting zone utilization areaVSAvoidwasted space in cutting zone
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric D-shaped cross-section is designed to better fit within the cutting zone aperture, allowing the food product to occupy more of the available cutting space. This asymmetric configuration eliminates wasted space that occurs with traditional symmetric shapes, thereby increasing the effective cutting area and reducing material loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the two-dimensional cross-sectional geometry of the food product to maximize space utilization in the cutting zone. By carefully designing the D-shaped profile with specific curvature and straight side configurations, the product occupies more area within the cutting zone aperture, effectively utilizing the available spatial dimension without increasing product volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS9609880B2System and method for manufacturing and processing a food product
Publication Date: 2017.04.04 HILLSHIRE BRANDS CO
  • US9609880B2 patent drawing
  • US9609880B2 patent drawing
  • US9609880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for manufacturing and processing a food product, such as forming, cooking, transporting, and slicing. The food product includes an elongated body having a generally D-shaped cross section. Additionally, the system includes a buffering and equilibrating apparatus which compensates for a difference in cycle times between the cooking system and the slicing system.