D2D Discovery Message Format Identification via Reference Signals
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In Device-to-Device (D2D) communication systems, distinguishing between different discovery message formats is challenging due to varying payload sizes and formats, leading to ambiguity and increased computational complexity for receivers, especially when mixed consumer, public safety, and relay UEs are discoverable on the same carrier.
Innovation Solution
Implement methods at Layer 1 of the first communication device to identify and differentiate discovery message formats by mapping reference signal sequences, resource mapping schemes, guard periods, or cyclic prefix lengths, allowing correct processing and transmission parameters to be applied, and using dedicated signaling fields to indicate message formats.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If discovery messages with varying payload sizes and formats are transmitted on the same carrier, then service versatility is improved, but message detection precision deteriorates due to format ambiguity
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies the principle of using different reference signal sequences (analogous to color changes) to indicate different discovery message formats. Each format (consumer, public safety, relay) is associated with a specific reference signal sequence, allowing receivers to identify the format through sequence detection before payload processing, thereby resolving the ambiguity caused by varying payload sizes and formats on the same carrier.
2Adaptability or versatility
If multiple discovery message formats are supported on the same carrier, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases due to format differentiation requirements
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements preliminary action by having the transmitter indicate the discovery message format using reference signal sequences before the actual payload transmission. This allows the receiver to pre-configure the appropriate format-specific parameters and processing logic in advance, avoiding the need for complex runtime analysis of payload content to determine format, thereby reducing receiver complexity while maintaining multi-format support.
3Device complexity
If format identification is performed without reference signal mapping, then device complexity is reduced, but message detection reliability deteriorates due to increased false alarms
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces reference signal sequences as an intermediary element between the physical layer transmission and higher layer processing. These sequences serve as format indicators that mediate the communication between transmitter and receiver, enabling reliable format identification without requiring complex payload analysis. The intermediary reference signals provide a simple yet reliable mechanism for format differentiation, reducing false alarms while maintaining low processing complexity.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
The disclosed embodiments herein relate to a method in a first communication device (600), a first communication device (600), a method in a second communication device (700) and a second communication device (700) and computer programs respectively. The method in the first communication device (600) comprises: receiving (201) from the second communication device (700), a discovery message at Layer 1 of the first communication device (600); identifying (202) a message format of the received discovery message; decoding (203) the received discovery message according to the identified message format; and sending (204) the decoded discovery message to higher layers, L2/L3, of the first communication device.