5G D2D Resource Pool Switching for Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 5G communication systems, device-to-device (D2D) communication experiences interference and latency due to contention for resources, leading to compromised quality of service (QoS) and safety critical system failures, especially during device transitions between cells or zones.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method for devices to switch between resource pools based on sensing, using either sensing-based or random resource selection, to optimize resource allocation and minimize transmission interruptions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If devices contend for the same resources in D2D communication, then resource allocation is simplified, but interference increases and QoS deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation complexityVSAvoidquality of service
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The resource pool is segmented into multiple sub-pools or groups, allowing devices to select from different resource sets. This segmentation reduces contention for individual resources while maintaining overall system simplicity, thereby improving QoS without significantly increasing allocation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Devices perform sensing and resource selection in advance before actual transmission. By preliminarily identifying and reserving resources through sensing-based resource selection, devices avoid last-minute contention and interference, improving transmission reliability while keeping the allocation mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If devices switch resource pools during transitions, then QoS is improved, but transmission latency increases due to sensing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of serviceVSAvoidtransmission latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Devices perform sensing and resource pool selection in advance before actual transmission needs arise. By preliminarily identifying suitable resource pools during idle periods or transition phases, devices minimize the time required for resource switching, thereby reducing transmission latency while maintaining QoS improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The resource pool switching mechanism is made dynamic, allowing devices to adaptively select between sensing-based and random resource selection based on current conditions. This dynamic approach enables faster switching when sensing time is constrained, reducing latency while still improving QoS when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-generated harmful factors

If sensing-based resource selection is used, then interference is reduced, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinterferenceVSAvoidresource selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensing process is segmented into discrete, manageable steps with clear decision thresholds. Devices sense specific resource parameters and compare them against predefined criteria, reducing the overall complexity of the sensing-based selection process while still effectively identifying and avoiding interfering resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Devices perform sensing on a partial set of critical resource parameters rather than exhaustively analyzing all possible interference conditions. This partial sensing approach reduces processing complexity while still achieving sufficient interference avoidance for practical QoS improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Device complexity

If random resource selection is used, then device complexity is reduced, but interference and collision probability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource selection complexityVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The resource pool is segmented into multiple sub-pools, and devices use simple random selection within these segments rather than across the entire pool. This segmentation maintains the simplicity of random selection while reducing the probability of collisions and interference by distributing devices across different resource segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11895552B2Resource arrangement
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US11895552B2 patent drawing
  • US11895552B2 patent drawing
  • US11895552B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a communication method and system for converging a 5th-Generation (5G) communication system for supporting higher data rates beyond a 4th-Generation (4G) system with a technology for Internet of Things (IoT). The present disclosure may be applied to intelligent services based on the 5G communication technology and the IoT-related technology, such as smart home, smart building, smart city, smart car, connected car, health care, digital education, smart retail, security and safety services. A method for switching resource pools by a device arranged to transmit according to a first resource pool is provided. The method includes sensing a second resource pool, determining whether the second resource pool has been sensed sufficiently long to apply sensing based resource selection, and selecting resources from an exceptional pool by using random resource selection, if the second resource pool has not been sensed sufficiently long to apply sensing based resource selection.