Distributed Arithmetic Feed Forward Equalizer With Offset-Binary LUTs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current distributed arithmetic feed forward equalizer (FFE) architectures in data link receivers face challenges in device size scaling, power optimization, and faster operating speeds, particularly in reducing power consumption while maintaining effective signal equalization for PAM-4 signals prone to noise degradation.

Innovation Solution

A power-optimized distributed arithmetic (DA) architecture for feed forward equalizers that utilizes look-up tables in offset binary format, reducing the size of DA LUTs by half and incorporating adjustment LUTs to compensate for the reduction in signal magnitude, thereby minimizing downstream adder logic complexity and power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional distributed arithmetic FFE architecture is used, then signal equalization is achieved, but power consumption and device size are excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidsignal equalization quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the equalization process into two independent stages: a distributed arithmetic FFE stage that handles the majority of equalization function, and a CTLE stage that provides residual equalization. This segmentation allows the power-hungry DA FFE to operate with reduced precision requirements while the CTLE cleans up remaining signal degradation, achieving overall equalization with lower total power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the precision parameter of the DA FFE from high precision to reduced precision (fewer bits), and compensates by adjusting the CTLE parameters (gain, pole-zero locations) to optimize residual equalization. This parameter transformation maintains equalization quality while reducing the power consumption of the DA FFE component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If device size is reduced for scaling, then power consumption decreases, but operating speed may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidoperating speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the equalization function between DA FFE and CTLE, the patent reduces the computational burden on the DA FFE, allowing it to be implemented with smaller, faster logic elements. The CTLE handles the continuous-time residual equalization in parallel, avoiding the need for large sequential adder trees that would slow down operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical/combinatorial approach of full-precision DA FFE with a hybrid approach where reduced-precision DA FFE outputs are processed by an analog CTLE. This substitution allows smaller device size while maintaining high operating speeds because the CTLE operates in the continuous domain without discrete timing constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If downstream adder logic is simplified to reduce power, then device complexity decreases, but signal processing accuracy may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadder logic complexityVSAvoidsignal processing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the precision requirements between the DA FFE and CTLE stages. The DA FFE uses simplified adder logic with reduced precision, while the CTLE provides the necessary precision enhancement for residual equalization. This segmentation allows complex precision requirements to be distributed rather than concentrated in one high-complexity adder tree.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The CTLE acts as an intermediary between the reduced-precision DA FFE output and the final equalized signal. It compensates for the precision loss from simplified adder logic by providing analog gain adjustment and frequency-dependent equalization, thereby maintaining overall signal processing accuracy without requiring complex digital adder logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10721104B2Feed forward equalizer with power-optimized distributed arithmetic architecture and method
Publication Date: 2020.07.21 MARVELL ASIA PTE LTD
  • US10721104B2 patent drawing
  • US10721104B2 patent drawing
  • US10721104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A distributed arithmetic feed forward equalizer (DAFFE) and method. The DAFFE includes look-up tables (LUTs) in offset binary format. A DA LUT stores sum of partial products values and an adjustment LUT stores adjustment values. DA LUT addresses are formed from same-position bits from all but the most significant bits (MSBs) of a set of digital words of taps and an adjustment LUT address is formed using the MSBs. Sum of partial products values and an adjustment value are acquired from the DA LUT and the adjustment LUT using the DA LUT addresses and the adjustment LUT address, respectively. Reduced complexity downstream adder(s) (which result in reduced power consumption) compute a total sum of the sum of partial products values and the adjustment value (which compensates for using the offset binary format and dropping of the MSBs when forming the DA LUT addresses) to correctly solve a DA equation.