DAG-Based Quantum Circuit Modeling via CSP

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quantum computing programming is complex and typically done at the gate level, making it difficult for users to design quantum circuits with desired properties, especially for non-experts, as it requires understanding of physics and specific algorithms, which are scarce and hard to create.

Innovation Solution

The use of a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) paradigm to model quantum circuits, allowing for the definition of constraints based on desired functionality, hardware, and architecture, with a CSP solver to provide a concrete representation that satisfies these constraints, enabling the creation of quantum programs that can be compiled and executed on quantum computers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If quantum programming is done at the gate level, then programming precision and control are improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming precisionVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quantum programming process into two distinct levels: a high-level algorithmic layer for designing quantum circuits using intuitive constraints, and a low-level gate implementation layer for actual execution. This segmentation allows users to work at the simpler high level while the system automatically handles the complex gate-level details, resolving the contradiction between programming precision and programming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a CSP solver as an intermediary component that translates high-level algorithmic constraints into concrete gate-level implementations. This mediator automatically handles the complex translation process, allowing users to specify quantum circuits at a high level without directly managing gate-level complexity, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and programming precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If quantum programming is done at the gate level, then programming precision is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprogramming precisionVSAvoidease of quantum circuit design
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quantum programming process into two distinct levels: a high-level algorithmic layer for designing quantum circuits using intuitive constraints, and a low-level gate implementation layer for actual execution. This segmentation allows users to work at the simpler high level while the system automatically handles the complex gate-level details, resolving the contradiction between programming precision and programming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a CSP solver as an intermediary component that translates high-level algorithmic constraints into concrete gate-level implementations. This mediator automatically handles the complex translation process, allowing users to specify quantum circuits at a high level without directly managing gate-level complexity, thus resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and programming precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If quantum algorithms are created manually with physics knowledge, then algorithm accuracy is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm accuracyVSAvoidquantum algorithm creation rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to automatically generate and optimize quantum circuits through the CSP solver without requiring manual intervention from experts. The solver self-service translates high-level constraints into executable quantum circuits, significantly increasing productivity while maintaining accuracy through constraint-based verification, thus resolving the contradiction between algorithm accuracy and creation rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the programming parameters from gate-level details to high-level algorithmic constraints. This parameter change allows non-experts to specify quantum circuits using intuitive constraints rather than complex gate sequences, dramatically increasing productivity while the CSP solver ensures accuracy by automatically satisfying all constraints during the translation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11995515B2DAG-Based CSP quantum circuit modeling
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 CLASSIQ TECH LTD
  • US11995515B2 patent drawing
  • US11995515B2 patent drawing
  • US11995515B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method, apparatus and product for modeling of quantum circuits and usages thereof. A method comprises obtaining a model of a quantum circuit that comprises a set of decision variables, corresponding domains, and constraints, wherein the set of decision variables comprise gate assignment decision variables that define an assignment of a gate to a qubit in a cycle in the quantum circuit. The method comprises automatically determining a set of valuations for the set of decision variables. The set of valuations are selected from the corresponding domains and satisfy the constraints. Based on the set of valuations the quantum circuit is synthesized.