damper

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dampers face challenges in providing precise airflow control, especially at low flow rates, due to manufacturing tolerances and hysteresis, which complicates their use in both smoke extraction and ventilation applications.

Innovation Solution

A damper design featuring primary and secondary blades that can move independently to control airflow, allowing for more precise control of airflow volume by adjusting the movement range of a smaller number of primary blades, while secondary blades can also move to further adjust airflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If all damper blades are used for airflow control, then the damper can provide large volume flow for smoke extraction, but precise control at low flow rates becomes difficult due to manufacturing tolerances and hysteresis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevolume of air flowVSAvoidprecise control of air flow
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The damper blades are segmented into two distinct groups: primary blades (first plurality) and secondary blades (second plurality). This segmentation allows independent control of each group, enabling precise airflow regulation at low flow rates by controlling only the primary blades, while maintaining the capability for high volume flow when both blade groups are opened.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If a single actuator controls all blades, then the device complexity is reduced, but the precision of airflow control at low flow rates deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation mechanismVSAvoidairflow control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The actuation system is segmented into two independent actuators: a first actuator for controlling the primary blades and a second actuator for controlling the secondary blades. This segmentation enables precise control at low flow rates through the first actuator while maintaining system capability for high volume flow, without requiring overly complex integrated control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If the damper is designed for smoke extraction with large flow area, then it meets smoke control requirements, but it causes difficulty for precise ventilation control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuse for smoke extraction and ventilationVSAvoidprecise volume of air flow control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The damper blade system is segmented into primary and secondary groups that can be independently actuated. For ventilation applications requiring precise control, only the primary blades are opened by the first actuator while secondary blades remain closed. For smoke extraction, both blade groups are opened to maximize flow area. This segmentation allows the same damper to adapt to both applications with appropriate precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The damper system dynamically adjusts its configuration based on application requirements. The primary blades can be positioned at various angles for precise ventilation control, while the secondary blades provide additional opening capacity when needed for smoke extraction. This dynamic adaptability allows the damper to optimize performance for different operational modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4417887A1damper
Publication Date: 2024.08.21 SWEGON AIR MANAGEMENT LTD
  • EP4417887A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4417887A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP4417887A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A damper 10 has a damper housing 12 that forms a channel or passage 16 through which airflow can pass. Within the damper housing 12 are damper blades 14 consisting of a primary blade 24 and secondary blades 25. The damper blades 14 can be orientated between a fully closed position 10A where airflow through the passage 16 is prevented to a fully open position 10B where the airflow through the passage 16 is permitted to a maximum volume flow. The primary blade 24 can be controlled to be moved toward the open position 10B when the secondary blades 25 are in the closed position 10A. This means volume of air flow can be more accurately controlled at lower flow in comparison to when all the blades are moved from their closed position.