Damping Arbor With Segmented Shock Absorbing Assemblies

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional damping mechanisms for cutters are complex, time-consuming to manufacture, and ineffective for larger cutters, with rubber rings prone to deformation and breakage under the weight of the rod body, leading to poor vibration absorption and stability issues.

Innovation Solution

A damping arbor with a rod body diameter of 60 mm or more, featuring at least three shock absorbing assemblies evenly spaced around the axis, each comprising a damper, vibration absorbers, and a blocking portion, which share the weight and provide uniform vibration absorption, increasing structural strength and reducing the risk of damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If a rubber ring damping mechanism is used, then vibration absorption is provided, but the manufacturing process becomes complicated and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration absorptionVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates the damping function directly into the rod body structure by forming recesses that receive shock-absorbing elements, merging the damping mechanism with the support structure. This eliminates the need for separate rubber ring components and simplifies the manufacturing process while maintaining vibration absorption effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The damping mechanism is segmented into multiple shock-absorbing assemblies distributed around the rod body perimeter. Each assembly independently absorbs vibration in different directions, providing comprehensive damping coverage. This segmentation allows for modular manufacturing and assembly, reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a single rubber ring damping component is used, then vibration absorption is achieved, but the service life is reduced due to deformation and breakage under rod body weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration absorptionVSAvoidservice life
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The damping function is divided into multiple shock-absorbing assemblies distributed around the rod body. Each assembly bears only a portion of the rod body weight and absorbs vibration independently. This distribution of load and function significantly reduces stress on each individual component, preventing deformation and breakage, thereby extending service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional damping mechanism components are used, then vibration absorption is provided, but the damping effect is poor for larger cutters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration absorptionVSAvoiddamping effectiveness for different cutter sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The rod body structure incorporates multiple recesses positioned at specific locations around its perimeter, each designed to receive a shock-absorbing element. This local structural modification creates targeted damping zones that effectively counteract vibration forces in larger cutters, adapting the damping mechanism to the specific size and vibration characteristics of the cutter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple shock absorbing assemblies are disposed averagely, then better damping effect is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamping effectVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The shock-absorbing elements are integrated into recesses formed directly in the rod body structure, merging the damping components with the support structure. This integration reduces the number of separate parts and simplifies assembly while maintaining the benefits of multiple distributed damping points for improved vibration absorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves improved vibration absorption stability for cutters, extends the service life by distributing weight among multiple assemblies, and allows for cost-effective and easy replacement of broken parts, ensuring consistent processing quality and reduced deformation of the rod body.

Implementation Method 1

the at least three shock absorbing assemblies 4 being inserted into the end surface 11 and surrounding the axis 17 with equal intervals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

achieves a better damping effect through a plurality of shock absorbing assemblies disposed averagely

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorbing: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS10179367B1Damping arbor
Publication Date: 2019.01.15 LO KUN CHI
  • US10179367B1 patent drawing
  • US10179367B1 patent drawing
  • US10179367B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a damping arbor, including a rod body and a damping mechanism. A diameter of the rod body is larger than or equal to 60 mm. The rod body includes an end surface for being connected with a cutter head assembly and further defining an axis. The damping mechanism includes at least three shock absorbing assemblies. The at least three shock absorbing assemblies are inserted into the end surface and surrounding the axis with equal intervals.