Damping Circuit for EMI Cancellation in Compact Electronics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Small electronic devices face communication range degradation due to electromagnetic interference (EMI) generated by their electronic circuitry and connections, which is not adequately addressed by existing EMC standards, especially in devices with tightly packed components and limited space for shielding solutions.

Innovation Solution

A damping circuit is implemented to enclose or position adjacent to the electronic circuits, generating an opposite phase electromagnetic field that cancels out the interfering fields, using a configuration of electrical loops and impedances to optimize EMI cancellation and maximize signal-to-noise ratio, particularly through the use of capacitors and tunable impedance elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If metal shielding (Faraday cage) is used around electronic circuits to reduce electromagnetic interference, then electromagnetic interference is reduced, but the device becomes bulky and the antenna performance is dampened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic interferenceVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the bulky metal shielding (Faraday cage) from the device, replacing it with a compact damping circuit that achieves EMI reduction without the volume penalty of traditional shielding approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical shielding approach (metal Faraday cage) with an electrical/electromagnetic solution (damping circuit with capacitor and resistor) that achieves the same EMI protection function in a much smaller form factor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If ground planes and filtering are used to reduce electromagnetic interference in larger devices, then electromagnetic interference is reduced, but small devices do not have the space to integrate such solutions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic interferenceVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by placing the damping circuit directly adjacent to the specific electronic circuits generating EMI, providing targeted EMI reduction at the source rather than requiring device-wide ground planes or filtering infrastructure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The damping circuit components (capacitor and resistor) are nested within or adjacent to the existing circuit board layout, integrating the EMI solution within the existing device volume rather than requiring additional space

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Use of energy by moving object

If wires transporting audio content are used in Class D amplifier, then high efficiency is achieved, but high-level electromagnetic interference is generated that degrades wireless communication channel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplifier efficiencyVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a damping circuit as an intermediary element between the Class D amplifier wires and the wireless communication antenna, which mediates the EMI problem by absorbing harmful electromagnetic emissions while allowing the efficient Class D amplifier operation to continue

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful electromagnetic interference generated by the Class D amplifier wires into beneficial heat energy through the damping circuit's resistor, which dissipates the EMI as heat while preserving the amplifier's high efficiency operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Significantly reduces unwanted electromagnetic interference, extending communication range and maintaining signal quality by partially or fully canceling the EMI emissions, thereby enhancing the performance of communication systems in small devices.

Implementation Method 1

A damping circuit is implemented to enclose or position adjacent to the electronic circuits, generating an opposite phase electromagnetic field that cancels out the interfering fields

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field generation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

using a configuration of electrical loops and impedances to optimize EMI cancellation and maximize signal-to-noise ratio, particularly through the use of capacitors and tunable impedance elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentEP3157101B1Electromagnetic device
Publication Date: 2019.07.31 NXP BV
  • EP3157101B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3157101B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP3157101B1 patent drawingFigure 5

AI summary

One example discloses an electromagnetic device, including: a first circuit, configured to generate a first electromagnetic field; a second circuit responsive to the first electromagnetic field; a damping circuit configured to generate a second electromagnetic field in response to a current induced by the first electromagnetic field; and wherein the second electromagnetic field reduces the second circuit's responsiveness to the first electromagnetic field.