Stationary Damping Wings for Bridge Vibration Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large span bridges face significant challenges with wind-induced vibrations and flutter, which can lead to structural instability due to low natural frequencies and inadequate damping, with existing solutions either being costly or inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A device featuring stationary damping wings with a lateral offset from the bridge deck, providing a fixed spatial relationship and large lateral eccentricity to enhance vibration damping efficiency, without moving parts, thereby increasing the critical wind speed and stabilizing the bridge structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If aerodynamic control surfaces with mechanical dampers are used, then vibration damping is achieved, but device complexity and cost increase due to moveable parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration damping reliabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the mechanical damper and moveable parts from the vibration damping system, retaining only the essential aerodynamic control surface (wing) that provides damping through its fixed geometric configuration and lateral offset arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a moveable control surface that actively responds to vibrations, the invention uses a fixed control surface with a specific lateral offset arrangement that passively dampens vibrations through aerodynamic forces, inverting the traditional active control approach

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If fixed wings are positioned vertically above the bridge deck edges, then structural robustness is improved, but vibration damping efficiency is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural robustnessVSAvoidvibration damping efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions the wing arrangement from a vertical positioning (above the bridge deck) to a lateral offset positioning (side-by-side with the bridge deck), adding a lateral dimension to the spatial arrangement that significantly improves vibration damping efficiency while maintaining structural robustness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Length of moving object

If large span lengths are used, then bridge crossing capability is improved, but flutter stability decreases due to low natural frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebridge span lengthVSAvoidflutter stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces damping wings as intermediary aerodynamic elements that mediate between the wind flow and the bridge deck, providing additional damping forces that counteract the reduced natural damping caused by large span lengths and low natural frequencies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively raises the critical wind speed by 64% and improves torsional divergence stability, offering a robust, reliable, and cost-efficient solution for damping wind-induced vibrations, with potential for placement at specific regions of high vibration amplitude, and is constructed to withstand varying wind directions without additional mechanical connections.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one damping wing is permanently stationary or stationary upon wind acting on the bridge in a given direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

the at least one damping wing dampens vibrations of the bridge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Implementation Method 3

the distance between the center of the at least one damping wing and the center of the bridge deck is at least 1.2 times larger than half the width of the bridge deck

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMoment arm leverage: Lever

Data Source

PatentUS10196785B2Device for damping vibrations of a bridge
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 TUTECH INNOVATION
  • US10196785B2 patent drawing
  • US10196785B2 patent drawing
  • US10196785B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A damping device for damping vibrations of a bridge with a bridge deck comprises at least one damping wing comprising a center and configured to dampen vibrations of the bridge. A longitudinal direction of the at least one damping wing is disposed parallel to a longitudinal direction of the bridge deck and the at least one damping wing is stationary upon wind acting on the bridge in a given direction. At least one support structure is laterally attached to at least one side of the bridge deck and configured to attach the at least one damping wing to the bridge deck such that the at least one damping wing is disposed with a lateral offset from an outer edge of the bridge deck facing the at least one damping wing.