Traffic Warning Collision Correction for Dangerous Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to provide effective warnings for dangerous vehicles such as chartered buses and hazardous material transport vehicles, leading to serious consequences in traffic accidents.

Innovation Solution

A method to estimate and correct potential collision strength of dangerous vehicles by considering differences in performance parameters with non-dangerous vehicles, using driving and pavement status information, and perform targeted traffic warnings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional traffic warning systems are used, then the system is simple to implement, but the warning accuracy is insufficient and false alarms occur frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The warning system is segmented into multiple independent modules: dangerous vehicle identification module, performance parameter difference calculation module, collision strength estimation module, and correction module. Each module processes specific aspects of the warning calculation independently, improving accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes from using uniform warning parameters for all vehicles to dynamically adjusting parameters based on vehicle type (dangerous vs. non-dangerous) and performance characteristics. By introducing performance parameter differences (positioning accuracy, communication delay, driving status information quality) as variable factors, the system achieves higher warning accuracy through parameter differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If uniform warning standards are applied to all vehicles, then the system is easy to operate, but the reliability of warning for dangerous vehicles is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning reliabilityVSAvoidsystem operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by differentiating warning standards based on vehicle location and type. Dangerous vehicles (chartered buses, hazardous material transport vehicles) receive enhanced warning protocols with stricter criteria and higher priority processing, while ordinary vehicles use standard protocols. This localized differentiation improves reliability for critical vehicles without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes warning parameters based on vehicle classification and performance characteristics. By adjusting thresholds, priority levels, and correction factors according to vehicle type and performance parameter differences, the system achieves higher reliability for dangerous vehicle warnings while maintaining operational simplicity through automated parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If performance parameter differences are considered in warning calculation, then warning accuracy improves, but the calculation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision strength estimation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The calculation process is segmented into distinct stages: base collision strength calculation using driving status information, performance parameter difference calculation for each vehicle type, and correction application. This segmentation allows complex calculations to be performed in manageable steps, improving accuracy while reducing overall computational complexity through structured processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces performance parameter differences (positioning accuracy, communication delay, information quality) as correction factors that modify the base collision strength calculation. By changing parameters dynamically based on vehicle performance characteristics rather than using fixed values, the system achieves higher estimation accuracy while managing complexity through parameter-based adjustment rather than complex algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12437645B2Traffic warning method and apparatus, and computer storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD
  • US12437645B2 patent drawing
  • US12437645B2 patent drawing
  • US12437645B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A traffic warning method and apparatus includes: obtaining driving status information of a dangerous vehicle on a target road and pavement status information of the target road; determining potential collision strength of the dangerous vehicle against a first vehicle according to driving status information of the first vehicle on the target road, the driving status information of the dangerous vehicle, and the pavement status information of the target road; correcting the potential collision strength of the dangerous vehicle against the first vehicle according to a difference between a performance parameter of the dangerous vehicle and a performance parameter of a non-dangerous vehicle on the target road; and performing traffic warning according to the corrected potential collision strength of the dangerous vehicle against the first vehicle.