DAPS Failure Recovery and MRO for 5G Handovers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 3GPP 5G networks lack detailed mechanisms for dual active protocol stack (DAPS) failure recovery and mobility robustness optimization (MRO) during conditional handover (CHO) and DAPS handover procedures, leading to issues like Too Early or Too Late Handovers, or Handover to Wrong Cell.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method for user equipment (UE) to receive CHO configuration information, perform CHO procedures, and transmit time-related assistant information to serving cells, along with a DAPS handover procedure that includes starting a handover timer and performing a random access procedure, to enhance failure recovery and resource optimization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If handover procedures are performed without detailed failure recovery mechanisms, then handover speed is maintained, but handover reliability deteriorates due to Too Early or Too Late Handovers, or Handover to Wrong Cell

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover reliabilityVSAvoidfailure recovery mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary failure detection by starting a handover timer upon receiving handover command information and monitoring for RLF or handover failure before the handover is complete. This early detection mechanism allows the system to identify potential handover failures (Too Early, Too Late, or Wrong Cell) during the handover process itself, enabling timely recovery actions rather than waiting for failure to manifest

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes a feedback loop where the UE transmits assistant information (including handover failure type, timing, and measurement data) back to the network after detecting handover failures. The network uses this feedback to perform MRO and adjust handover parameters, creating a continuous improvement cycle that enhances handover reliability while managing system complexity through intelligent automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If assistant information is transmitted for every handover failure, then network optimization accuracy is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by transmitting different types of assistant information based on the specific failure scenario and network configuration. The assistant information includes selectively reported elements such as handover failure type (Too Early, Too Late, Wrong Cell), timing information, and measurement data, allowing the system to provide precise failure characterization only where and when needed, rather than uniform comprehensive reporting for all failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by transmitting assistant information selectively rather than for every possible handover failure. The network can configure which failure types trigger assistant information transmission, and the UE reports only the necessary subset of failure data required for effective MRO, avoiding excessive signaling while maintaining sufficient precision for network optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230422137A1Methods and apparatuses for a DAPS failure recovery mechanism and a MRO mechanism for CHO and DAPS procedures
Publication Date: 2023.12.28 LENOVO (BEIJING) LTD
  • US20230422137A1 patent drawing
  • US20230422137A1 patent drawing
  • US20230422137A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present application relate to methods and apparatuses for a dual active protocol stack (DAPS) failure recovery mechanism and a mobility robustness optimization (MRO) mechanism for conditional handover (CHO) and DAPS procedures. According to an embodiment of the present application, a method can include: receiving CHO configuration information, wherein the CHO configuration information is associated with a CHO candidate cell, wherein the CHO configuration information includes a RRC reconfiguration message and a set of one or more execution conditions; in response to meeting one or more execution conditions associated with the CHO candidate cell, performing a CHO procedure from a source cell to the CHO candidate cell; and in response to successfully accessing the CHO candidate cell or in response to an occurrence of a failure during the CHO procedure, transmitting time related assistant information to a serving cell, wherein the serving cell is one of the source cell and the CHO candidate cell. In addition, a recovery procedure and a MRO mechanism associated with a DAPS handover procedure are also studied.