Distributed Antenna System Signal Processing Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current Distributed Antenna System (DAS) architectures lack flexibility and scalability, requiring all signal processing operations to be performed in the central unit, which limits adaptability and increases fiber link transmission bottlenecks as the number of remote units increases.

Innovation Solution

The proposed DAS architecture enables per-user signal processing by partitioning physical layer functionalities between the central unit and remote units, allowing for efficient application of algorithms like adaptive beamforming and network coordination, and reduces fiber link throughput requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If all signal processing operations are performed in the central unit, then system control is centralized, but flexibility and scalability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the signal processing functionality into two segments: central unit processing (higher layer protocols L2/L3) and remote unit processing (physical layer L1 operations). This segmentation enables distributed signal processing where each remote unit can independently perform beamforming and other physical layer operations, thereby enhancing system flexibility and scalability without requiring all processing to be centralized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If all signal processing operations are performed in the central unit, then centralized control is achieved, but scalability is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments processing tasks between central and remote units, allowing remote units to perform independent physical layer operations. This enables the system to scale by adding more remote units to the fiber network without proportionally increasing central unit processing burden, as each remote unit handles its own signal processing locally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each remote unit is empowered to perform self-processing of signal operations including beamforming and physical layer processing. This self-service capability at the remote unit level reduces the bottleneck at the central unit and enables better scalability as remote units can operate autonomously while still being coordinated through the fiber network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If more remote units are connected to a given fiber ring, then system coverage is expanded, but fiber link transmission becomes a bottleneck

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of remote unitsVSAvoidfiber link throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the signal processing workload so that physical layer operations are performed at each remote unit rather than being aggregated at the central unit. This segmentation reduces the data volume that must be transmitted over the fiber link, as only processed and formatted signals need to be transmitted, thereby reducing the transmission bottleneck effect when more remote units are connected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial processing at the remote units, where only the necessary physical layer processing is performed locally rather than all processing being done centrally. This partial action approach reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted over the fiber network, allowing more remote units to be connected without exceeding transmission capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Adaptability or versatility

If per-user signal processing is enabled at remote units, then flexibility and scalability are enhanced, but device complexity at remote units increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidremote unit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments processing complexity by implementing only essential physical layer processing capabilities at remote units (such as beamforming and signal conversion) while leaving higher layer protocol processing at the central unit. This selective segmentation approach enables per-user processing flexibility without requiring full-featured complex processing equipment at each remote unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10014910B2Method for distributed mobile communications, corresponding system and computer program product
Publication Date: 2018.07.03 TELECOM ITALIA SPA
  • US10014910B2 patent drawing
  • US10014910B2 patent drawing
  • US10014910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of arranging exchange of signals between user terminals in a cellular communication system and at least one base station. The base station includes a central unit and a plurality of remote units. The signals are exchanged between the central unit and the remote units as aggregated signals for plural user terminals. The signals are processed at the remote units as distinct signals each associated with a respective one of the plural user terminals.