Dashboard Camera VRU Detection for Low-Complexity Collision Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Many vehicles lack environment monitoring systems to detect vulnerable road users (VRUs) due to high complexity and cost, making it infeasible to integrate complex sensor systems, which compromises safety and efficiency in preventing collisions with pedestrians and cyclists.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle environment monitoring device that uses a dashboard camera system to capture video data, process it to detect and track VRUs, predict potential collisions, and alert drivers or management systems, reducing the complexity and cost compared to traditional systems while maintaining accuracy and improving scalability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex sensor systems (RADAR, LIDAR) are integrated to detect VRUs, then detection reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVRU detection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a dashboard camera to capture video frames that serve as a visual copy of the road environment, replacing the need for complex physical sensor systems. The computer vision model processes this visual copy to detect VRUs, achieving reliable detection through image analysis rather than expensive sensor arrays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical sensor systems (RADAR, LIDAR) with a software-based computer vision approach. Instead of using physical sensors to detect VRUs, the system uses a trained machine learning model to analyze video frames and identify vulnerable road users, substituting hardware complexity with computational intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If complex sensor systems are integrated to detect VRUs, then detection precision is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVRU detection precisionVSAvoidvehicle manufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dashboard camera, a relatively inexpensive and widely available component, to capture video data for VRU detection. This approach replaces expensive specialized sensors with a cost-effective consumer-grade camera, significantly reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from physical sensor measurements (radio waves, light pulses) to visual image analysis. By transforming the detection task into image processing, the system achieves precise VRU detection using standard camera technology rather than expensive specialized sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If video data is processed to detect and track VRUs, then detection accuracy is improved, but computing resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVRU detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputing resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by capturing and storing video frames at regular intervals before full processing is needed. The system pre-processes frames to identify potential VRUs, so when detection is required, the computational workload has already been partially reduced, minimizing real-time energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial processing by focusing computational resources only on frames where VRUs are detected or suspected. Instead of processing every frame at full resolution, the system selectively intensifies analysis only when necessary, reducing overall computing resource consumption while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11926318B2Systems and methods for detecting a vulnerable road user in an environment of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 VERIZON CONNECT DEVELOPMENT LTD
  • US11926318B2 patent drawing
  • US11926318B2 patent drawing
  • US11926318B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a device may receive video data associated with video frames that depict an environment of a vehicle. The device may identify an object depicted in the video frames, wherein an object detection model indicates bounding boxes associated with the object. The device may determine, based on the bounding boxes, a configuration of the bounding boxes within the video frames. The device may determine, based on the configuration of the bounding boxes, that the object is a vulnerable road user (VRU) that is in the environment. The device may determine a trajectory of the VRU based on a change in the configuration between video frames of a set of the video frames. The device may determine, based on the trajectory, a probability of a collision between the VRU and the vehicle. The device may perform, based on the probability, an action associated with the vehicle.