Dashboard Predictive Growth Algorithm Pipeline Revenue Forecasting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Enterprises face challenges in accurately forecasting revenue for new products or services lacking historical data, as traditional methods rely on historical sales data which is not feasible in such cases, leading to incomplete insights and potential misalignment of advertising efforts with sales objectives.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a predictive growth algorithm within a software dashboard graphical user interface for pipeline performance management, which selects from various algorithms, disaggregates enterprise-specific revenue goals into subgoals, evaluates data from input pipelines, identifies deficiencies, and recommends corrective actions to achieve these goals, allowing for adaptive and predictive revenue forecasting without prior data requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional revenue forecasting methods based on historical sales data are used, then forecasting accuracy is improved for established products, but the method becomes inapplicable for new products or services lacking historical data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue forecasting accuracyVSAvoidapplicability to new products
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the input parameters for revenue forecasting from historical sales data to alternative data sources including market research, competitor analysis, industry reports, and customer feedback. This parameter substitution enables the forecasting system to function for new products without requiring historical sales data, while maintaining forecasting capability through different data inputs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If advertising budget is increased to improve product visibility and sales, then market reach is improved, but the effectiveness becomes difficult to measure and optimize

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales volumeVSAvoidadvertising effectiveness data
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that continuously monitors advertising performance by comparing actual sales outcomes against forecasted revenues. The system measures the impact of advertising spend on revenue generation, identifies underperforming campaigns, and provides recommendations for optimization. This closed-loop feedback system transforms advertising effectiveness from an intangible concept into measurable, actionable data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple predictive growth algorithms are available for selection, then adaptability to different enterprise needs is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm selection flexibilityVSAvoidsoftware system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a software dashboard as an intermediary layer between the user and multiple predictive growth algorithms. This dashboard provides a unified interface that automatically selects appropriate algorithms based on enterprise characteristics, data availability, and forecasting requirements. The intermediary simplifies the user experience while maintaining access to multiple sophisticated algorithms behind the scenes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230410015A1Dashboard analysis using computation engine for pipeline performance management
Publication Date: 2023.12.21 PREMONIO INC
  • US20230410015A1 patent drawing
  • US20230410015A1 patent drawing
  • US20230410015A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for dashboard analysis using a computation engine for pipeline performance management are disclosed. A predictive growth algorithm is selected from a plurality of predictive growth algorithms using a software dashboard graphical user interface (SD-GUI). Enterprise-specific revenue goals are developed, employing code executed as a result of using the SD-GUI. The enterprise-specific revenue goals are based on the selected predictive growth algorithm. The revenue goals are disaggregated into subgoals for portions of the enterprise. The portions correspond to enterprise input pipelines. A relationship between the enterprise-specific revenue goals and the input pipelines is quantified. Data from the input pipelines corresponding to the subgoals is evaluated employing executed code. One or more deficiencies in the data are identified with respect to accomplishing one or more of the subgoals, employing executed code.