DAT Sensor Installation Detection in HVAC Air Ducts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

HVAC systems face challenges in detecting improper installation of discharge air temperature (DAT) sensors, leading to operational issues and inefficiencies in heating and cooling processes.

Innovation Solution

A method and system where a controller monitors the HVAC system's operation, determining if the circulation fan has been operational for a predetermined time, checks for cooling or heating demands, and compares indoor and DAT sensor temperature values to identify if the DAT sensor is properly installed, sending a message to a service provider if the sensor is improperly installed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If DAT sensor installation is monitored continuously, then detection accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary checks by first verifying fan operation status and cooling demand conditions before conducting the temperature comparison. This staged approach ensures detection accuracy by confirming proper operating conditions while avoiding unnecessary complexity from continuous monitoring of all parameters simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The HVAC system monitors and diagnoses its own sensor installation status using its existing controllers and sensors. The system compares DAT sensor readings with indoor air temperature readings and automatically detects improper installation, eliminating the need for external monitoring equipment or manual checking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If temperature comparison is performed frequently, then detection reliability improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs temperature comparisons periodically based on specific triggers (fan operation for predetermined time, cooling demand presence) rather than continuously. This periodic monitoring approach maintains detection reliability by checking at meaningful intervals while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Before performing the energy-intensive temperature comparison, the system first checks preliminary conditions (fan operation status, cooling demand). This ensures comparisons are only performed when necessary, improving detection reliability for actual installation issues while minimizing unnecessary energy consumption from redundant comparisons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple operational conditions are checked before detection, then false alarms reduce, but response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse alarm reductionVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes predetermined conditions (fan operation duration, cooling demand presence) that must be satisfied before temperature comparison. These preliminary checks filter out false alarms caused by improper operating conditions while using predetermined thresholds and triggers to minimize the time delay before detection occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on real-time operational conditions. When cooling demand is present and fan has operated for the predetermined time, the system activates temperature comparison. This dynamic approach reduces false alarms by adapting to actual system state while maintaining quick response when conditions indicate a potential installation issue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3457045B1Method and apparatus for identifying erroneous discharge air temperature (DAT) sensor installation
Publication Date: 2023.09.06 LENNOX IND INC
  • EP3457045B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3457045B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3457045B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of monitoring a HVAC system to detect erroneous sensor installation. The method includes determining whether a circulation fan has been operational for a first predetermined time interval. If the circulation fan has been operational for the first predetermined time interval, determining whether a cooling demand is present. If the cooling demand is present, determining whether the HVAC system has been conditioning air for the first predetermined time interval responsive to the cooling demand. If the HVAC system has been conditioning the air for the first predetermined time interval, determining whether a difference between an indoor air temperature value corresponding to an enclosed space and an air temperature value from a discharge air temperature (DAT) sensor is greater than a predetermined temperature value. If the difference is not greater than the predetermined temperature value, forwarding a message indicating that the DAT sensor positioned within a duct of the HVAC system is improperly installed.