Data Analyzing Apparatus Dynamic Parameter Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional data analyzing apparatuses face challenges in using an optimum combination of analytical parameters and input data formats, leading to decreased accuracy when input data trends change, and struggle to simultaneously address these issues.

Innovation Solution

A data analyzing apparatus that generates and evaluates format variations and analytical parameter combinations, dynamically switching between different analytical methods to maintain accuracy by reactivating and updating the most accurate knowledge models based on changing data trends.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a clear-cut solution is used to select from semi-infinite variations of processed data and analytical methods, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision (accuracy of analytical results) deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of selecting analytical methodsVSAvoidaccuracy of analytical results
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts analytical parameters and data formats based on changing input data trends. Instead of using a fixed clear-cut solution, the apparatus continuously adapts the combination of analytical parameters and input data formats to maintain high accuracy when data trends change, resolving the contradiction between simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes parameters (analytical parameters and data formats) based on the characteristics of input data. By automatically adjusting these parameters according to data trends, the system achieves high accuracy without requiring manual selection from semi-infinite variations, thus reducing complexity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the same parameter is used for extracting knowledge models continuously, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability (accuracy maintenance) deteriorates when input data trend changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of continuous analysisVSAvoidaccuracy maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors input data trends and provides feedback to automatically adjust analytical parameters. When a change in data trend is detected, the feedback mechanism triggers parameter adjustment to maintain accuracy, thus preserving reliability while keeping the operation simple through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus performs self-adjustment of analytical parameters based on detected data trends. The system serves itself by automatically recognizing when parameter changes are needed and implementing them without external intervention, maintaining both ease of operation and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple format variations and analytical parameter combinations are evaluated, then manufacturing precision (accuracy) is improved, but device complexity and loss of time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of analytical resultsVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-evaluates and stores the accuracy of different analytical parameter combinations and data format variations before actual analysis. By preparing these evaluations in advance, the apparatus can quickly select the optimal combination during runtime without performing complex real-time evaluations, thus maintaining high accuracy while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of evaluating all possible semi-infinite combinations, the system evaluates a sufficient subset of format variations and parameter combinations that covers the necessary range for accurate analysis. This partial evaluation approach achieves the required accuracy without the excessive complexity of exhaustive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple format variations and analytical parameter combinations are evaluated, then manufacturing precision (accuracy) is improved, but loss of time (processing time) increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of analytical resultsVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs accuracy evaluations of different format variations and parameter combinations in advance and stores the results. During actual analysis, it simply retrieves the pre-evaluated optimal combination based on current data characteristics, achieving high accuracy without the time cost of real-time exhaustive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The apparatus evaluates only the necessary subset of format variations and parameter combinations that are most likely to yield accurate results for the given data type. This selective partial evaluation maintains high accuracy while significantly reducing the time loss compared to evaluating all possible combinations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10025789B2Data analyzing apparatus and program
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 KK TOSHIBA
  • US10025789B2 patent drawing
  • US10025789B2 patent drawing
  • US10025789B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A data analyzing apparatus of an embodiment generates a format variation, analytical algorithm name, and analytical parameter not stored in a first storage device, and executes analysis. The data analyzing apparatus determines whether the application accuracy is lower than the knowledge model accuracy. If the determination result is “not lower”, the data analyzing apparatus reactivates a format variation generating device and an analytical parameter generating device. If the determination result is “lower”, the data analyzing apparatus reads out a format variation and knowledge model name associated with the highest priority order in the first storage device, and executes analysis.