Data Bus Component Cryptographic Functionality Standardization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cryptographic systems in industrial settings, such as motor vehicles, face challenges in ensuring consistent and verifiable cryptographic functionality across diverse components, as different suppliers implement varying protection methods without standardized key lengths and protocols, leading to increased development overhead and security risks.

Innovation Solution

A component for connecting to a data bus that implements cryptographic functionality using a specified selection of cryptographic functions, methods, and protocols adapted to the component's performance, with defined minimum key lengths, ensuring a consistently high level of protection that is easily verifiable and adaptable to the component's requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If different suppliers implement varying protection methods without standardized key lengths and protocols, then cryptographic functionality can be adapted to specific component requirements, but development overhead increases and verification becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of cryptographic functionalityVSAvoiddevelopment overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments cryptographic functionality into standardized building blocks (cryptographic functions, methods, protocols) that can be independently selected and combined. This allows adaptation to specific component requirements while maintaining standardized interfaces and verification procedures, thereby reducing development overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes standardized parameters (key lengths, function selections, protocol versions) that define cryptographic configurations. These standardized parameters enable consistent verification across different components while still allowing selection of appropriate cryptographic strength levels based on component performance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a wide range of cryptographic functions and protocols are made available, then cryptographic security can be enhanced, but the complexity of managing and verifying cryptographic functionality increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecryptographic securityVSAvoidcomplexity of managing cryptographic functions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the cryptographic system into discrete, standardized components (functions, methods, protocols) with clearly defined interfaces. This segmentation allows comprehensive cryptographic functionality to be available while simplifying management through modular selection and standardized verification procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal framework with standardized interfaces and verification methods that work across all cryptographic functions and protocols. This universal approach allows diverse cryptographic capabilities to be managed through consistent procedures, reducing the complexity of managing multiple cryptographic implementations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If cryptographic key lengths are not standardized, then key length can be optimized for specific component performance, but verification of cryptographic protection levels becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent performance optimizationVSAvoidverification of protection level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes standardized parameter ranges (minimum and maximum key lengths) that are tailored to different component performance classes. This allows optimization of cryptographic key lengths for specific component capabilities while maintaining standardized verification criteria within each performance class, ensuring consistent security assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10057071B2Component for connecting to a data bus, and methods for implementing a cryptographic functionality in such a component
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • US10057071B2 patent drawing
  • US10057071B2 patent drawing
  • US10057071B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A component for connecting to a data bus wherein the component implements at least one cryptographic functionality. Also disclosed is a method for implementing a cryptographic functionality in such a component. The implementation of the cryptographic functionality is based on a specified selection of cryptographic functions, methods and protocols adapted to the performance of the component, wherein minimum lengths are defined for the respectively used cryptographic keys.