Automated Resource Provisioning Policy for Data Center Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Resource provisioning in enterprise data centers is inefficient due to multiple approval and execution steps, which are time-consuming and complex, especially as the complexity of requests increases.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates a resource provisioning policy based on historical request data, automatically approves or denies resource allocation requests by applying predefined policy parameters, and updates the policy accordingly, enabling self-service and reducing the need for custodian intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual approval processes are used for resource provisioning, then control and authorization are maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol and authorizationVSAvoidapproval time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service resource provisioning by automatically evaluating requests against predefined policies. The resource provisioning system autonomously approves or denies requests without requiring manual custodian intervention, allowing the system to serve itself while maintaining control through policy-based decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring resource allocation outcomes and updating policy parameters accordingly. This allows the system to learn from past decisions and improve its automated approval process while maintaining appropriate control levels through adaptive policy adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple approval steps are implemented, then authorization control is ensured, but operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization controlVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The approval process is segmented into automated policy evaluation and manual custodian review components. The system automatically handles routine requests that meet policy criteria, while only exceptional cases requiring human judgment are escalated to custodians, thereby maintaining authorization control while significantly improving operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of the approval process by introducing dynamic policy parameters such as maximum allocation percentages and utilization thresholds. These parameter-based decisions enable automated approval for standard cases, improving productivity while maintaining control through configurable policy parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If automated policy-based approval is used, then processing speed increases, but policy complexity must be managed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidpolicy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The policy framework is designed to be universal and multi-functional, handling various resource types and approval scenarios through a single unified policy structure. This reduces the perceived complexity by providing a consistent approach across different resource provisioning contexts while maintaining high processing speed through automated evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual resource provisioning is performed, then flexibility in decision-making is maintained, but the process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making flexibilityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines dynamic automated policy evaluation with flexible manual custodian intervention. The automation handles standard cases with predefined policies, while maintaining the flexibility for custodians to override decisions or handle exceptional cases, thereby reducing process complexity while preserving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10891160B2Resource provisioning
Publication Date: 2021.01.12 KYNDRYL INC
  • US10891160B2 patent drawing
  • US10891160B2 patent drawing
  • US10891160B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for resource provisioning are disclosed. A method includes: generating, by a computer device, a resource provisioning policy for a resource; receiving, by the computer device, a request for an allocation of the resource from an account; applying, by the computer device, the resource provisioning policy to the request based on receiving the request; automatically approving or denying, by the computer device, the request based on the applying the resource provisioning policy to the request; updating, by the computer device, the resource provisioning policy for the account based on the automatic approving or denying the request.