Automated Bootstrap for Data Center Hardware Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual expansion of data centers in cloud-computing networks is time-consuming, inconsistent, and prone to service interruptions due to the lack of automation in integrating new hardware into the existing fabric.

Innovation Solution

An automated bootstrap process that verifies and integrates non-configured hardware into a cloud-computing fabric, utilizing self-contained workflows to specify, discover, validate, and deploy hardware inventory as a fabric-computing cluster, ensuring efficient and scalable expansion of data center capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual procedures are used to integrate new hardware into the data center fabric, then flexibility in handling diverse hardware configurations is maintained, but the process becomes time-consuming, inconsistent, and prone to service interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveManual configuration flexibilityVSAvoidHardware integration speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically discovering hardware components, determining their roles based on detected capabilities, and configuring them without manual intervention. The fabric controller autonomously integrates new devices into the fabric by detecting them, determining appropriate roles, and applying configurations automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical configuration processes are replaced with automated electronic discovery and configuration systems. The fabric controller uses electronic discovery mechanisms to detect hardware, determine roles through capability analysis, and automatically apply configurations, replacing the manual mechanical process of plugging in and manually configuring each device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual configuration processes are used for hardware integration, then complex hardware topologies can be handled with human judgment, but consistency and reliability of the integration process deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHandling of complex hardware topologiesVSAvoidIntegration consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the fabric controller discovers hardware, determines roles based on detected capabilities, applies configurations, and monitors the results. This feedback mechanism ensures that the automated system can adapt to complex topologies while maintaining consistency through standardized discovery and configuration procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically determines hardware roles by detecting and analyzing capability parameters of discovered devices. Based on the detected parameters (such as device type, capabilities, and characteristics), the fabric controller automatically assigns appropriate roles and configurations, enabling adaptation to complex topologies while maintaining consistency through parameter-driven decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If automated bootstrap processes are implemented for hardware integration, then integration speed and consistency are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHardware integration efficiencyVSAvoidAutomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fabric controller is designed as a universal system that can handle multiple device types, roles, and configuration scenarios through a single automated discovery and configuration framework. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple specialized tools, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high automation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary discovery and role determination actions automatically as hardware is introduced to the fabric, before manual configuration would be needed. By pre-detecting hardware, determining appropriate roles based on capabilities, and preparing configurations in advance, the system reduces the complexity of subsequent manual intervention while improving integration efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If manual steps are used for integrating hardware into the fabric, then detailed control over each configuration step is maintained, but service interruptions and downtime increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveConfiguration controlVSAvoidService interruption duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The automated bootstrap process enables continuous fabric operation during hardware integration. The fabric controller performs discovery, role determination, and configuration actions continuously as hardware is added, without requiring service interruptions. This maintains useful fabric operations throughout the integration process, eliminating downtime while preserving configuration control through automated procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS10120725B2Establishing an initial configuration of a hardware inventory
Publication Date: 2018.11.06 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US10120725B2 patent drawing
  • US10120725B2 patent drawing
  • US10120725B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for automatically configuring an inventory of hardware to interact seamlessly with a datacenter are provided. Initially, customer-specific specifications are collected from a user, which are automatically supplemented with platform-specific specifications. These specifications are used to select the hardware inventory from a set of predefined hardware clusters, where each of the predefined hardware clusters represents compatible configurations of hardware assets and logical assets that have been demonstrated to function congruently. A cluster-configuration file is derived from data held within a stock-keeping unit (SKU) that describes the selected hardware inventory. The cluster-configuration file is populated with abstract symbolic representations that act as placeholders for expected values that are presently unknown. Network resources are assigned by automated conversion of the abstract symbolic representations into concrete values. The cluster-confirmation file is merged with previous versions of datacenter inventory to create an updated version of the datacenter inventory.