Dynamic Power Load Management for Data Center Peak Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dynamic power management systems in data centers lack the capability for real-time control and strategic migration of power usage to alternative sources, leading to inefficiencies and delays in responding to power supply and demand imbalances.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a Resource Operational Value Optimization (ROVO) system that dynamically adjusts power and compute load in real-time, utilizing real-time data from various sources, including power markets, weather, and operational feedback, to optimize power consumption and profitability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If dynamic power management systems adjust power usage based on grid demand, then power efficiency is improved, but real-time control capability is insufficient causing delays in responding to power supply and demand imbalances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower efficiencyVSAvoidresponse delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts power management strategies in real-time based on changing grid conditions. The control system continuously monitors power supply and demand imbalances and adapts power usage adjustments accordingly, transitioning from static to dynamic operation to eliminate response delays while maintaining power efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring grid demand signals and power usage patterns. This feedback loop enables the system to detect power supply and demand imbalances immediately and adjust power usage in real-time, eliminating the response delays that occur in systems without continuous monitoring and adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If coincident peak pricing is used to manage grid demand, then grid stability is improved, but additional charges during peak periods increase operational costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid stabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively reducing power usage before coincident peak periods begin. By anticipating peak demand based on grid signals and historical patterns, the system adjusts power consumption in advance, avoiding the additional charges that would otherwise be incurred during peak pricing periods while still contributing to grid stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system skips the high-cost peak pricing periods by rapidly adjusting power usage to coincide with off-peak or reduced-demand periods. This strategy rushes through the critical decision-making and implementation process to shift power consumption away from coincident peak windows, thereby maintaining grid stability support while avoiding operational cost increases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If power usage is reduced during peak periods, then grid strain is reduced, but compute load and productivity may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrid strainVSAvoidcompute load
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments compute workloads into different priority categories and adjusts power usage selectively. By dividing the compute load into essential and non-essential tasks, the system can reduce power consumption during peak periods for non-critical operations while maintaining productivity for high-priority workloads, thereby reducing grid strain without significantly impacting overall compute output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by dynamically adjusting compute load settings, power consumption levels, and workload prioritization based on grid conditions. During peak periods, it modifies these parameters to reduce overall power usage while maintaining critical operations, effectively reducing grid strain while preserving essential productivity through parameter optimization rather than uniform reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250123897A1Coincident peak avoidance
Publication Date: 2025.04.17 CIPHER TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250123897A1 patent drawing
  • US20250123897A1 patent drawing
  • US20250123897A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for real-time, scalable, systematic, event-based, model-driven operational value optimization for resource sites, such as a data center. A system can receive a plethora of real-time information that impacts the optimization of operations at the resource site. The system can apply some or all of this real-time data to powerful decision-making logic which analyzes various factors gleaned from the real-time information in order to determine a dynamic value optimization for operating the resource site. Methods and systems also provide the ability to adaptively command operation of the resource site (e.g., full curtailment of power and/or compute load, partial curtailment of power and/or compute load, etc.) in a manner that dynamically and in real time optimizes operations. Furthermore, the methods and systems provide a solution that has modularly designed logic and a horizontally designed framework to efficiently support a plethora of applications, even at large-scale.