Data Center Resource Prediction and Hardware Installation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data centers face challenges in efficiently managing resource utilization and determining the optimal location for installing additional hardware to prevent resource overload.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes timeseries telemetry data to predict future resource utilization in a data center, determining whether to install additional hardware at one of two physical locations based on the time available until the resource overload occurs and the installation time at each location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If additional hardware is installed at a second physical location, then data center capacity is increased, but the installation time is longer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata center capacityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of resource utilization trends and predicts future capacity needs before the actual installation decision is made. By analyzing timeseries telemetry data in advance and identifying when capacity will be exceeded, the system enables proactive planning of hardware installation at appropriate locations based on predicted timelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects between first and second physical locations for hardware installation based on real-time resource utilization metrics and predicted future demands. The selection is not static but adapts to changing conditions, choosing the first location when quick deployment is needed and the second location when longer installation time is acceptable but provides strategic advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If hardware installation location is selected based on minimum installation time, then deployment speed is improved, but strategic optimization is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidstrategic optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors resource utilization through timeseries telemetry data and uses this feedback to inform location selection decisions. The feedback loop includes predicting future resource utilization patterns and using these predictions to determine whether to install hardware at the first or second physical location, balancing immediate deployment needs with long-term strategic considerations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the decision parameter for location selection from a simple minimum-time criterion to a multi-factor analysis that includes predicted resource utilization timing, current capacity metrics, and strategic objectives. This parameter transformation enables the system to optimize for both speed and strategic value by adjusting which factors weigh most heavily in the decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12210435B2Automated data center expansion
Publication Date: 2025.01.28 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US12210435B2 patent drawing
  • US12210435B2 patent drawing
  • US12210435B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system can determine timeseries telemetry data of a first resource utilization of a data center maintained by the system. The system can predict, from the timeseries telemetry data, a second resource utilization of the data center will occur at a future time, the second resource utilization exceeding a threshold amount of resource utilization of the data center. The system can determine, based on an amount of time available until the future time, a selected location indicative of whether to install additional hardware at a first physical location of the data center, or a second physical location of the data center, wherein an amount of time associated with installing the additional hardware at the first physical location is less than an amount of time associated with installing the additional hardware at the second physical location. The system can install the additional hardware at the selected location.