Data Classification System Using Meta-Feature Clustering for Model Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current automated classification model selection techniques are time-consuming and resource-intensive, making it difficult to accurately classify large datasets in real-time, especially with the increasing volume of data.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating meta-features from labeled datasets using clustering indices, correlating them with a prebuilt model to estimate classification performance scores, and selecting top models to build an ensemble classification model for efficient classification of unlabeled datasets, utilizing techniques like majority voting or model stacking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional classification model selection approach is used, then classification performance can be evaluated, but the process is time-consuming and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification performanceVSAvoidmodel selection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-calculates and stores classification performance scores for multiple classification models across different datasets in a database before actual classification tasks. When a new classification task arises, the system retrieves pre-computed performance scores instead of training and evaluating models from scratch, significantly reducing model selection time while maintaining reliable performance evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a database that stores replicated performance score data from previous model evaluations. Instead of re-evaluating all classification models on all datasets, the system copies and retrieves relevant pre-computed performance scores, transforming a computationally intensive process into a quick data retrieval operation that maintains evaluation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If traditional classification model selection approach is used, then classification accuracy can be achieved, but computational resources are consumed excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs computationally intensive model training and performance evaluation in advance during data preprocessing phases, storing the results in a database. During actual classification tasks, the system retrieves pre-computed performance scores, shifting the computational burden from real-time classification to offline preprocessing, thereby reducing energy consumption during critical classification operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent stores replicated performance score data in a database that can be quickly accessed during classification tasks. This copying of performance data eliminates the need to re-compute performance metrics for each classification task, significantly reducing computational resource requirements while maintaining accurate model selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Extent of automation

If automated classification model selection techniques are used, then user intervention is reduced, but the process remains time-consuming for large datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic model selectionVSAvoidclassification speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent automatically pre-calculates and stores classification performance scores for multiple models during data preprocessing. When classification tasks arrive, the system automatically retrieves pre-computed scores from the database, enabling both automated model selection and high classification speed without requiring real-time computational intensive operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system copies pre-computed performance scores from a database into memory for quick retrieval during classification tasks. This copying approach enables automated model selection to proceed at high speed by replacing computationally intensive real-time evaluation with rapid data retrieval operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240242131A1System and method for data classification
Publication Date: 2024.07.18 CLARITRICS INC D B A BUDDI HEALTH
  • US20240242131A1 patent drawing
  • US20240242131A1 patent drawing
  • US20240242131A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes a method and system (120) for data classification. The system (120) comprises at least one processor (230) coupled to memory (240) and configured to receive at least one first dataset comprising at least one labeled dataset and at least one unlabeled dataset and process the received labeled dataset to generate at least one first meta feature comprising cluster indices. The processor (230) is further configured to estimate a classification performance score of each of a plurality of classification models for the at least one labeled dataset by correlating the generated meta features with a prebuilt model. The processor (230) is further configured to generate a list comprising the classification models arranged in descending order of the estimated performance scores and select a top N classification models from the list to build an ensemble classification model for classifying the at least one unlabeled dataset.