Data Cloud Configuration Tuning via Workload Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern data clouds require dynamic tuning of configuration parameters to optimize performance and cost, but existing tools are cumbersome and often require expert administration, making them infeasible for complex workloads.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that uses historical query workload metadata to determine and adjust configuration settings for parameters like auto-suspend intervals, warehouse size, and maximum clusters, automatically backing off to previous settings if performance thresholds are not met, thereby optimizing resource utilization and cost.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual tuning by expert database administrators is used, then performance optimization is achieved, but operational complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance optimizationVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-tuning by automatically analyzing workload patterns, identifying bottlenecks, and adjusting configuration parameters without human intervention. The database system monitors its own performance metrics and applies tuning decisions autonomously, eliminating the need for expert administrators while maintaining optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous monitoring of performance metrics and workload patterns, using this feedback to dynamically adjust configuration parameters. The feedback loop enables the system to learn from past performance and automatically evolve tuning decisions over time, replacing manual expert intervention with automated adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If manual tuning processes are implemented, then configuration optimization is achieved, but time consumption and resource overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration optimizationVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-analyzes workload patterns and pre-determines optimal configuration settings based on historical data and predicted future workloads. By performing tuning actions in advance based on patterns rather than reacting to performance degradation, the system reduces the time required for configuration optimization while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If automated tuning is implemented, then ease of operation improves, but risk of performance degradation increases without expert oversight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidperformance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements conservative tuning strategies that prioritize stability over aggressive optimization. Configuration changes are applied gradually with built-in safety mechanisms that prevent drastic adjustments, cushioning against potential performance degradation while maintaining ease of automated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors performance metrics and automatically reverses or adjusts tuning decisions if degradation is detected. This feedback-based safety mechanism allows automated operation while maintaining reliability through real-time performance validation and automatic correction of suboptimal configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11693857B1Managed tuning for data clouds
Publication Date: 2023.07.04 KEEBO INC
  • US11693857B1 patent drawing
  • US11693857B1 patent drawing
  • US11693857B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations described herein relate to systems and methods to configure a data warehouse system. In some implementations, a method includes obtaining, by a configuration management system, historical query workload metadata associated with a data warehouse from the data warehouse system, determining, a first configuration setting associated with a configurable parameter for a first time period, wherein the first configuration setting is associated with a computing resource utilization at the data warehouse system different from a previous configuration setting, transmitting, to the data warehouse system, the first configuration setting for the configurable parameter, receiving, from the data warehouse system, during the first time period, query workload metadata, determining, whether the query workload metadata meets a threshold performance, and based on a determination that the query workload metadata does not meet the threshold performance, transmitting a backoff configuration setting for the configurable parameter to the data warehouse system.