Data Consistency Management via Query Pattern Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cloud computing environments face challenges in achieving scalability and performance while maintaining data consistency, as relational database management systems (RDBMSes) provide strong consistency but at the expense of performance and availability, and NoSQL systems offer higher performance but at the risk of data inconsistency.

Innovation Solution

A data consistency management system that automatically determines the suitability of queries and data tables for processing by either RDBMS or NoSQL data stores, based on access patterns, and translates SQL queries to NoSQL APIs, allowing for a balanced tradeoff between consistency and scalability by identifying and managing data tables with high read-to-write ratios and specific query patterns in NoSQL data stores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If RDBMS is used to ensure data consistency, then data consistency is improved, but performance and availability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data tables into two categories: critical data tables requiring strong consistency (managed by RDBMS) and non-critical data tables tolerating eventual consistency (managed by NoSQL). This segmentation allows different consistency models to be applied selectively, improving overall system performance while maintaining data consistency where required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different consistency guarantees are applied locally to different data tables based on their specific requirements. Critical data tables receive strong consistency through RDBMS, while non-critical tables use eventual consistency through NoSQL, optimizing the tradeoff between consistency and performance for each local context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If RDBMS is used to ensure data consistency, then data consistency is improved, but availability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidavailability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data tables into critical and non-critical categories, allowing non-critical tables to be served by NoSQL systems that provide higher availability and elasticity, while critical tables maintain strong consistency through RDBMS.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides multi-functionality by supporting both strong consistency and eventual consistency models within the same application platform, allowing flexible adaptation to different operational requirements and improving overall system availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If NoSQL is used to improve performance, then scalability is improved, but data consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies and segments data tables suitable for NoSQL management based on query patterns and consistency requirements, enabling scalability for non-critical data while maintaining consistency for critical data through RDBMS integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the consistency parameter dynamically based on data table characteristics and query patterns, using eventual consistency for non-critical tables to achieve scalability while maintaining strong consistency for critical tables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If manual determination of query suitability is performed, then query optimization is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic determination of query suitability and data table categorization without requiring manual intervention, using automated analysis of query patterns and data characteristics to optimize performance while simplifying system operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from query pattern analysis and performance monitoring to automatically adjust the determination of query suitability and data table categorization, optimizing performance dynamically without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2735979B1Data consistency management
Publication Date: 2020.05.20 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD
  • EP2735979B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2735979B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2735979B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A data consistency management system may include a memory storing machine readable instructions to receive a query, and determine a suitability of the query for processing by a NoSQL data store, or a RDBMS. The memory may further include machine readable instructions to rank data tables based on a combination of read queries and query patterns suitable for the NoSQL data store. Based on the ranking, the memory may further include machine readable instructions to determine data tables that are to be managed by the NoSQL data store, or by the RDBMS, determine whether the query is for a data table managed by the NoSQL data store, and based on a determination that the query is for a data table managed by the NoSQL data store, translate the query to NoSQL API calls for using the NoSQL data store to respond to the query.