Data-Driven Featurization for Professional Expertise Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to accurately match consumer needs with appropriate professionals due to inadequate classification techniques and unreliable data, leading to difficulties in determining specific services offered by service providers, especially in complex and specialized industries.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven approach that extracts, transforms, and analyzes vast amounts of industry-specific data to generate models predicting professional expertise, utilizing a system with data input, aggregation, pre-computation, and model building engines, along with a graphical user interface for search functionality to match user needs with suitable professionals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional broad classification techniques are used to categorize professionals, then the categorization process is simple, but the classification precision is insufficient to capture professional specialization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification precisionVSAvoidclassification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments professional classification into multiple hierarchical levels: broad industry categories, mid-level specializations, and fine-grained expertise areas. This multi-level segmentation allows the system to capture professional specialization without requiring a single overly complex classification scheme, resolving the contradiction between classification precision and complexity by distributing classification tasks across multiple manageable layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces additional dimensions to professional classification beyond traditional single-axis categorization. It adds dimensions such as service types, expertise areas, and skill sets, creating a multi-dimensional classification space. This allows the system to achieve high classification precision by examining professionals from multiple angles simultaneously, rather than relying on a single complex classification metric.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If self-reported expertise data is used to determine professional services, then data collection is easy, but the reliability of the information is low due to potential exaggeration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata reliabilityVSAvoiddata verification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where professional service data is continuously verified and updated based on actual service delivery outcomes, client interactions, and performance metrics. This closed-loop feedback system allows the platform to detect and correct exaggerations in self-reported expertise over time, improving data reliability while managing verification complexity through automated monitoring rather than manual review of every claim.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary verification mechanisms such as automated service completion tracking, client feedback systems, and third-party validation where applicable. These intermediaries act as mediators between self-reported expertise and verified credentials, providing objective evidence of professional capabilities without requiring direct manual verification of every self-reported skill, thus balancing reliability improvement with manageable verification complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If simple counting of service performance is used to evaluate professionals, then the evaluation process is straightforward, but it fails to account for data completeness and service quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation precisionVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the evaluation system from simple counting metrics to multi-parameter assessment that includes service completion rates, quality scores, client satisfaction ratings, and expertise verification status. By changing the evaluation parameters from single-dimensional counts to multi-dimensional quality metrics, the system achieves more precise professional evaluation while managing complexity through standardized parameter collection and automated calculation methodologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20210056438A1Data driven featurization and modeling
Publication Date: 2021.02.25 INCLUDED HEALTH INC
  • US20210056438A1 patent drawing
  • US20210056438A1 patent drawing
  • US20210056438A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-implemented systems and methods are disclosed for data driven expertise mapping. The systems and methods provide for obtaining data sets from data sources, wherein the data sets include services related data, analyzing the data sets, wherein the analysis generates information representative of the services related data, and generating training sets related to the data sets, wherein the training sets are based on known values. The systems and methods further provide for generating models, wherein the models are based on determining services provided by service providers using a combination of the services related data, the analysis of the data sets and the training sets, and provide a mapping of at least one service to service providers. The systems and methods additionally include evaluating the models based on known values and storing an indication for providing to a graphical user interface based on more models.