Data-Driven Architectural Design Optimizing Office Layouts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to create optimized architectural designs for office spaces that align with an organization's culture and goals, as they fail to effectively analyze and incorporate communication and collaboration patterns among employees.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that analyze metadata from digital communications and collaboration networks to generate data-driven architectural designs by partitioning employees into clusters based on interaction frequency, identifying key influencers, and determining spatial clustering, ultimately selecting design prototypes that optimize for criteria such as cost, wellness, and collaboration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated data-driven design systems are implemented, then design optimization and alignment with organizational culture improve, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the organizational network into clusters based on interaction patterns, dividing the complex design problem into manageable spatial zones that can be independently optimized and then integrated into the overall floorplan

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computational modeling layer that acts as an intermediary between raw communication metadata and architectural design outputs, transforming unstructured data into actionable spatial design parameters through network analysis and simulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If extensive analysis of organizational culture and communication patterns is conducted, then design alignment with organizational goals improves, but time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign alignmentVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary network analysis and identifies key spatial design parameters before generating floorplan configurations, pre-processing the organizational data to extract only the most relevant interaction patterns that will influence spatial arrangement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative organizational culture attributes into quantitative network parameters (interaction frequency, collaboration intensity, communication flow) that can be directly optimized through computational algorithms, enabling precise control over design alignment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If traditional seniority-based workspace assignment is used, then organizational hierarchy is maintained, but collaboration promotion and cultural alignment deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorganizational hierarchyVSAvoidcollaboration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different spatial arrangement strategies to different network clusters based on their specific interaction patterns, allowing high-collaboration teams to be placed in open, interconnected spaces while maintaining appropriate hierarchical distinctions through zoning and accessibility variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11704450B2Systems and methods for generating data-driven optimized architectural design
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 DOJO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US11704450B2 patent drawing
  • US11704450B2 patent drawing
  • US11704450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed systems and methods relate to generating and optimizing an architectural design. According to embodiments, a method can include receiving metadata of digital communications and collaboration between members of an organization. The method can also include generating a target network model indicating a work style of the members of the organization; a level of interaction between the members of the organization; a spatial clustering of the members; or a number, a size, and an allocation of rooms with a specialized purpose. The method can further include selecting at least one criterion for the architectural design, where the criterion can include: cost, wellness, community, work style, choice, privacy, or vibrancy. The method can further include determining criteria scores for one or more architectural design prototypes. Moreover, the method can include selecting the architectural design based on the criterion scores.