Coordinated Data Flow Synchronization in Multi-Modal Wireless Groups

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Legacy 3GPP systems lack effective coordination and synchronization of data streams across different user equipment (UEs) or within a single UE, limiting resource consumption and multi-modal service support.

Innovation Solution

Implementing methods and apparatuses to enhance communication coordination among UEs by associating data flows into coordinated communication groups managed by application servers, enabling UEs to determine which data flows belong to these groups and apply necessary coordination actions for service-level synchronization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If legacy 3GPP systems are used without coordination enhancements, then system simplicity is maintained, but data stream coordination and synchronization across UEs are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata stream coordinationVSAvoidcoordination system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a coordination entity (application server or network function) as an intermediary to manage data flow coordination between UEs. This intermediary receives coordination requests, determines coordination parameters, and provides coordination rules to UEs, thereby enabling reliable data stream coordination without requiring complex peer-to-peer coordination mechanisms between UEs themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The coordination system is segmented into distinct functional components: UE-side coordination clients, network coordination functions, and application servers. Each segment handles specific aspects of coordination (e.g., local trigger evaluation, remote trigger reception, rule enforcement), allowing the overall system to achieve reliable coordination while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Use of energy by moving object

If data flows are associated in coordinated communication groups, then resource consumption coordination is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource consumption coordinationVSAvoidgroup management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A network coordination function acts as an intermediary to manage coordinated communication groups. This intermediary handles group formation, member management, and coordination rule distribution, enabling efficient resource consumption coordination across grouped UEs without requiring each UE to independently manage complex group dynamics and resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

UEs equipped with coordination clients can autonomously evaluate local triggers and apply coordination rules based on their own resource status and communication needs. This self-service capability allows UEs to independently optimize their resource consumption within the coordinated group context, reducing the coordination overhead and management complexity that would otherwise be required from centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If UEs apply coordination actions for service-level synchronization, then multi-modal service quality is improved, but processing complexity at UE increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice-level synchronizationVSAvoidUE processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coordination entity serves as an intermediary that prepares and distributes coordination rules to UEs. These rules encapsulate the complex synchronization logic for multi-modal services, allowing UEs to simply evaluate triggers and apply pre-defined actions rather than implementing complex synchronization algorithms themselves, thereby achieving reliable service-level synchronization with minimal UE processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Coordination rules and synchronization parameters are determined and distributed to UEs in advance by the coordination entity. This preliminary action allows UEs to be pre-configured with the necessary coordination logic before actual multi-modal service execution, enabling them to perform simple trigger evaluation and rule application rather than complex real-time synchronization processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Extent of automation

If coordination rules and policies are provided to UEs, then automated coordination is improved, but information management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination automationVSAvoidcoordination information management
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The coordination entity acts as an intermediary that generates, manages, and distributes coordination rules and policies to UEs. This intermediary maintains the master coordination information, evaluates trigger conditions, and provides appropriate rules to UEs based on current system state, thereby enabling automated coordination while centralizing information management to prevent loss or inconsistency of coordination data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The coordination system implements feedback mechanisms where UEs report their state and trigger evaluations to the coordination entity, which then adjusts and redistributes coordination rules as needed. This continuous feedback loop ensures that coordination information remains current and accurate, maintaining high automation while preventing information loss through active monitoring and updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240334504A1Methods and systems for data flow coordination in multi-modal communications
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC
  • US20240334504A1 patent drawing
  • US20240334504A1 patent drawing
  • US20240334504A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and apparatus are for coordinating data flows from multiple user apparatuses, WTRUs, in a coordinated communication group. A method comprising receiving, by a non-access stratum, NAS, layer of a wireless transmit/receive unit, WTRU, and from an application server, a coordination identifier; sending, by the WTRU and to a core network entity, a request to establish a protocol data unit, PDU, session, wherein the request comprises the coordination identifier; receiving, by the WTRU, configuration information associated with the coordination identifier and the PDU session, wherein the configuration information comprises one or more rules associated with the PDU session that are to be coordinated with one or more rules associated with other PDU sessions; and receiving, by the WTRU, from the core network entity, a message indicating establishment of the PDU session.