Data Governance Graph for Interconnected Dataset Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data governance systems lack efficient methods for creating visual representations of interconnected data sets, leading to difficulties in data management, security, and compliance.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system for creating a data governance graph by receiving data sets from various sources, storing them in a catalog, determining common traits, generating representations of interconnections, and displaying these connections via a graphical user interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If data sets are stored in a centralized catalog without visual representation, then data storage is simple, but data management efficiency deteriorates due to difficulty in understanding data relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata managementVSAvoiddata relationship understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a visual copy (graphical representation) of the data catalog structure, showing data sets, traits, and interconnections in a visual format that preserves and communicates relationship information without altering the underlying data storage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the flat, one-dimensional data catalog into a two-dimensional visual graph with nodes and edges, adding a visual dimension that makes data relationships perceivable and manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If detailed data interconnections are tracked for security and compliance, then security and compliance monitoring improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity and complianceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional system where the same data catalog and graph structure serve multiple purposes: data storage, relationship tracking, security monitoring, and compliance verification, reducing overall system complexity through consolidation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a graphical representation layer as an intermediary between the raw data catalog and the security/compliance monitoring functions, simplifying the interface and reducing complexity in the monitoring layer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data trait analysis is performed to identify common traits, then data classification accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata classification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary analysis to identify and extract common traits from data sets before creating the graphical representation, preparing classification information in advance to reduce processing time during graph generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250165634A1Systems and methods for data asset access governance
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 TRUIST BANK
  • US20250165634A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165634A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165634A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for creating a governance graph representing data set interconnection. The data set interconnections may be based on common fields, sources, databases, applications, or patterns of usage. For example, the interconnections may be direct connections, where one data set is directly downstream from another data set. Alternatively, the interconnections may be indirect connections based patterns showing the data sets are commonly used together. For example, given data sets “A”, “B”, and “C”, if “B” is directly connected to “A” because it is downstream from “A”, and a particular group of users commonly use “B” and “C” together, “A” may be indirectly related to “C” based on the pattern of usage. In this example, the governance graph is configured to indicate the connection between “A” and “B” is stronger than the connection between “A” and “C”, whilst still showing said connection.