Data Ingestion Anomaly Detection via Predictive Volume Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Network administrators face challenges in detecting data ingestion anomalies and monitoring the health of data pipelines in IT environments, as current manual checking methods are inefficient and do not prompt timely detection of data pipeline breaks or spikes, leading to potential system failures.

Innovation Solution

A data intake and query system that uses a late-binding schema to process, index, and store machine data, enabling real-time anomaly detection and alerting through a data ingestion analytic subsystem, which includes anomaly detection logic and root cause detection logic, allowing for automatic identification and notification of data ingestion issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual checking methods are used to monitor data pipeline health, then system complexity is reduced, but detection timeliness and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata pipeline health monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service monitoring by automatically detecting data ingestion anomalies through the anomaly detection logic (524) that continuously analyzes data volume metrics without requiring manual intervention. The system self-monitors pipeline health by comparing actual data volumes against expected patterns and automatically generates alerts when anomalies are detected, eliminating the need for manual checking while maintaining simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the anomaly detection logic continuously monitors data ingestion patterns and provides real-time feedback about pipeline health status. When the detection logic identifies anomalies such as data breaks or spikes, it triggers alerting notifications that feed back to administrators, creating a closed-loop monitoring system that improves reliability without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of time

If real-time anomaly detection is implemented, then detection timeliness is improved, but system complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection timeVSAvoidanalytic subsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential anomaly detection functionality into a dedicated analytic subsystem (520) with specific detection logic (524), separating it from the core data ingestion pipeline. This extraction allows real-time anomaly detection to operate independently with minimal impact on the main system, reducing the complexity burden while maintaining fast detection capabilities through focused analysis on data volume metrics only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The anomaly detection logic performs partial monitoring by focusing specifically on data volume metrics rather than analyzing all possible data characteristics. This selective approach detects anomalies by comparing actual data volumes against expected patterns, achieving timely detection without the computational overhead of comprehensive analysis, thus balancing detection speed with system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data monitoring is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but processing overhead and system performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata ingestion anomaly detection precisionVSAvoiddata processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system performs partial monitoring by focusing exclusively on data volume metrics rather than analyzing all data characteristics in detail. The anomaly detection logic compares actual data volumes against expected patterns to identify anomalies, achieving sufficient measurement precision for pipeline health monitoring without the processing overhead of comprehensive data analysis, thus maintaining high processing throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the necessary monitoring data (data volume metrics) from the incoming data stream, separating monitoring functions from the main data processing pipeline. This extraction allows precise measurement of ingestion patterns without requiring the system to process or store all incoming data, maintaining both measurement precision and processing productivity by analyzing only the essential metrics needed for anomaly detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12050507B1System and method for data ingestion, anomaly detection and notification
Publication Date: 2024.07.30 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12050507B1 patent drawing
  • US12050507B1 patent drawing
  • US12050507B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized method is disclosed for automated handling of data ingestion anomalies. The method features training a data model based on a first volume of data associated with a first time period. Thereafter, using the data model, a predictive analysis is conducted on a second volume of data associated with a second time period subsequent to the first time period to produce a predicted data ingestion volume. After, a correlative analysis between the predicted data ingestion volume and an actual data ingestion volume during the second time period is conducted to produce a prediction error. A notification is generated based on the prediction error.