Data Intake Query System Scalable Distributed Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data intake and query systems face challenges in seamlessly searching and analyzing diverse data types from various data sources, as their capabilities are often limited to internal data stores, and processing flows are unidirectional, preventing comprehensive search and analysis across external data systems.

Innovation Solution

A data intake and query system is developed that utilizes a search process master and query coordinators combined with a scalable network of distributed nodes to collect and process data from diverse data systems, enabling search and analytics operations across internal and external data sources, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL data stores, cloud storage, and Hadoop distributed file systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If data is pre-processed and stored in internal data stores, then data retrieval and analysis efficiency is improved, but data flexibility and comprehensiveness deteriorate because only a fraction of generated data can be analyzed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retrieval efficiencyVSAvoiddata analysis flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data handling into two paths: pre-processed data stored in internal data stores for efficient retrieval, and raw data accessible from external data systems for comprehensive analysis. This segmentation allows both efficiency and flexibility to coexist by assigning different data types to different storage locations based on their usage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If storage capacity is increased to store raw data, then data flexibility and comprehensiveness are improved, but system complexity and data management difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata analysis flexibilityVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces external data systems as intermediaries between the data intake and query system and the diverse data sources. These external systems handle the complexity of storing and managing raw data from multiple sources, while the core data intake and query system maintains its simplicity by querying these external systems through standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If search capabilities are extended to external data systems, then data comprehensiveness is improved, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch capability scopeVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universal query capabilities that can search both internal data stores and external data systems through a unified interface. The query coordinator and distributed nodes are designed to handle multiple data sources with a single search mechanism, eliminating the need for separate search systems for different data locations and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If distributed nodes are added to process diverse data, then processing scalability is improved, but system complexity and coordination overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing scalabilityVSAvoidsystem coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The query coordinator implements feedback mechanisms to monitor the status and performance of distributed nodes. Based on this feedback, the coordinator dynamically assigns queries to appropriate nodes, balances workloads, and handles failures. This feedback-driven coordination reduces the complexity of managing distributed nodes by providing automated control rather than requiring complex manual coordination protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11194564B1Maintaining compatibility in a multi-component application
Publication Date: 2021.12.07 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11194564B1 patent drawing
  • US11194564B1 patent drawing
  • US11194564B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for providing a multi-component application, including a first and second component. Functionality of the application may be modified by modification of the first component, potentially without requiring modification of the second component. However, some functionalities added to application may require modifications to both the first and second component. To maintain compatibility between components, the first component can be configured to detect versioning information of a second component, and adjust its functionality to disable functions unavailable due to lack of compatibility with a current version of the second component. The first component can notify an end user of any such lack of compatibility, and potentially instruct the end user in updating the second component.