Data Lake Schema Versioning for Reliable Client Migration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data lakes face issues when schema changes cause errors or disrupt processes relying on the data, necessitating a solution to adapt to schema changes without disrupting client processes.

Innovation Solution

A self-versioning data lake system that detects schema changes, creates a new version while maintaining the initial version, and provides a transition period for clients to migrate, ensuring seamless schema updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If schema changes are implemented in a data lake, then the data lake can accommodate new data formats and structures, but existing client processes may break or produce errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschema adaptabilityVSAvoidprocess reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The data lake is segmented into multiple versions (v1, v2, etc.), where each version maintains a specific schema. When schema changes occur, a new version is created with the updated schema while the old version remains intact. This allows the system to accommodate new data formats (improving adaptability) while existing client processes continue to work with the old version (maintaining reliability).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting schema changes before they affect client processes. Schema change detection mechanisms monitor incoming data and identify schema evolution in advance. Transition periods are established before forcing clients to migrate to new versions, allowing proactive preparation rather than reactive breakdowns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If a single version of the data lake is maintained, then schema changes can be quickly implemented, but client processes must be immediately updated causing disruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschema update speedVSAvoidclient migration effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The data lake implements dynamic version management where multiple versions coexist simultaneously. Each version is dynamically accessible based on client needs. The system can quickly implement schema changes in new versions (improving productivity) while clients gradually migrate at their own pace during transition periods (reducing migration effort).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

When schema changes are detected, the system creates a copy of the data lake with the new schema rather than modifying the existing one. This copying mechanism allows rapid schema evolution (improving productivity) while the original copy remains available for existing clients (reducing migration effort).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Device complexity

If schema changes are allowed without versioning, then the data lake remains simple to manage, but any schema modification causes immediate errors in dependent processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata lake management complexityVSAvoidprocess reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The data lake implements self-service versioning through automated schema change detection and automatic version creation. The system monitors schema evolution, detects changes, and creates new versions automatically without requiring manual intervention. This automation manages the complexity of versioning (keeping device complexity acceptable) while ensuring process reliability through proper version management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If multiple versions of the data lake are maintained, then client processes can continue to work without disruption, but storage requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess reliabilityVSAvoiddata storage volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a lifecycle management approach where old data lake versions are discarded after a transition period once clients have migrated to newer versions. This allows the system to maintain multiple versions for reliability (ensuring process reliability) while periodically removing obsolete versions to control storage growth (managing data storage volume).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS12608349B2Self-versioning data lake
Publication Date: 2026.04.21 INTERNATIONAL GAME TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US12608349B2 patent drawing
  • US12608349B2 patent drawing
  • US12608349B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to maintaining a self-versioning data lake. According to one embodiment, a method for providing access to a data lake can comprise maintaining a corpus of data in an initial version the data lake, monitoring versioning information for each of a plurality of schemas for data submitted to the data lake, and detecting a change in a schema of the plurality of schemas based on the monitoring of the versioning information for the plurality of schema. A new version of the data lake can be created based on the detected changes in the schema while maintaining the initial version of the data lake. A notification of availability of the new version of the data lake can be provided to users of the data lake.