Data Lake Version Control with Atomic Commits and Branch Merging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional data management tools are inadequate for managing large volumes of data in data lakes due to cost and technology limitations, leading to inconsistent data updates and the loss of ACID transactional consistency, which complicates change management and version control.

Innovation Solution

Implementing distributed version control (Nessie) on data lakes using commits, branches, tags, and merges to ensure transactional consistency and enable efficient management of data changes, compatible with existing SQL tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional data management tools are used to manage large volumes of data in data lakes, then storage capacity is improved, but data consistency and version control are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata volumeVSAvoiddata consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data management into versioned snapshots, where each commit creates a discrete version of the data lake state. This segmentation allows traditional data lakes to maintain large storage capacity while introducing structured version control through commit points, branches, and tags that ensure data consistency across different versions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer (the version control system with commits and branches) between the storage system and users. This intermediary manages data consistency by tracking all changes through commits and allowing users to access specific versions, thus maintaining reliability without limiting storage capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If distributed version control is implemented on data lakes, then data consistency and version control are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransactional consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the version control system universal by designing it to work with existing data lake architectures and SQL tools. The commit, branch, and tag mechanisms provide transactional consistency across diverse data lake implementations without requiring system-specific changes, thus managing complexity through a standardized interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The version control system operates autonomously by automatically tracking data changes through commits and maintaining version history. This self-service capability reduces operational complexity by eliminating the need for manual version management while ensuring transactional consistency through automated commit propagation across the data lake.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If isolated data changes are enabled through branches and commits, then collaboration and experimentation are improved, but change management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollaboration efficiencyVSAvoidchange management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data changes into isolated commits and branches, allowing multiple teams to work independently on different data modifications without interfering with each other. This segmentation enables parallel collaboration while simplifying change management through clear version boundaries that make merging and conflict resolution more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The version control system maintains continuous version history through chained commits, allowing collaboration to proceed continuously without disrupting existing data versions. This continuity enables experimentation and iteration while managing complexity through an unbroken chain of versioned changes that can be reviewed and merged systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12596705B2Change control and version management of data
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 DREMIO CORP
  • US12596705B2 patent drawing
  • US12596705B2 patent drawing
  • US12596705B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system performs a distributed version control on a data lake. A change to the data lake can be performed within a single atomic commit that defines a set of changes. Commits are built on top of each other and describe incremental changes, which creates a sequence of atomic commits that defines a history of changes. The commits can be identified by hash values, and branches can be defined to refer to commits. A new commit updates a branch head reference to the new commit so that the branch head always refers to the latest version of a chain of commits in the branch. The system can create tags that define, for example, a release version and can merge source commits onto target commits including merging the head of one branch onto the head of another branch.