Data Managing Method for Restricting Invalid Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data management methods cannot restrict data copying based on individual user permissions, leading to invalid data distribution, as they either prohibit copying entirely or allow it uniformly, without considering the order of users in document circulation.

Innovation Solution

A data managing method that inputs data identification information, user identification information, and process identification information, determining if the user is permitted to execute processes by referencing permission data, and forbidding output processes if not permitted, ensuring valid data distribution by specifying user order.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If copying is prohibited uniformly for all users, then data security is improved, but data circulation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoiddata circulation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating permission settings for different users rather than applying a uniform prohibition. Each user is assigned specific permission levels (e.g., view-only, copy-allowed, edit-permitted) based on their role and authorization, allowing data security to be maintained while enabling appropriate circulation among authorized users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic permission management where user access rights can be changed over time. Permission data is updated to reflect changing authorization states, such as when a user's role changes or when data circulation requirements evolve, allowing the system to adapt security and circulation needs dynamically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If copying is allowed uniformly for all users, then data circulation efficiency is improved, but data security deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata circulation efficiencyVSAvoiddata security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating permission settings for different users rather than applying a uniform prohibition. Each user is assigned specific permission levels (e.g., view-only, copy-allowed, edit-permitted) based on their role and authorization, allowing data security to be maintained while enabling appropriate circulation among authorized users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If permission checking is performed for each user, then data security is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing permission data that associates user identification information with process identification information before actual data operations occur. This permission framework is set up in advance, allowing rapid authorization checks during data circulation without adding significant complexity to real-time operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces permission data as an intermediary layer between users and data resources. This permission data structure acts as a mediator that simplifies the authorization process by providing a standardized format for storing and checking user permissions, reducing the complexity of direct user-data authorization management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If uniform copying prohibition is applied, then data security is improved, but adaptability to different user needs deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidadaptability to user needs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating permission settings for different users rather than applying a uniform prohibition. Each user is assigned specific permission levels (e.g., view-only, copy-allowed, edit-permitted) based on their role and authorization, allowing data security to be maintained while enabling appropriate circulation among authorized users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality through a comprehensive permission data structure that can accommodate multiple user roles, data types, and permission levels within a single unified system. This multi-functional permission framework can adapt to various user needs and data circulation scenarios while maintaining consistent security management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8117665B2Data managing method, data managing device and data managing server suitable for restricting distribution of data
Publication Date: 2012.02.14 KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS TECH INC
  • US8117665B2 patent drawing
  • US8117665B2 patent drawing
  • US8117665B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In order to prevent invalid distribution of data, a data managing method includes the steps of inputting a document, extracting, from the input document, a document No. for identifying the document, receiving the input of a user ID for identifying a user, determining whether or not a process for the input document is permitted for the user identified by the acquired user ID by referring to permission data, and forbidding the execution of output processes for the input data in the case where it has been determined in the determining step that the process is not permitted. The permission data is data which associates, for each document No., user IDs with the process names for identifying processes permitted for the document.