Data Matrix Verification Lighting Configuration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for verifying Data Matrix marks lack efficiency in automatically determining the quality and readability of these marks across various lighting environments, leading to inconsistent results and increased verification time.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a plurality of light sources to form different light configurations, automatically select the best configuration for verification based on user-selected mark types, and generate reports indicative of the verification results, ensuring compliance with industry standards like MIL-STD-130N and AIM DPM-1-2006.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple light sources and configurations are used to verify Data Matrix marks, then verification accuracy and reliability are improved, but device complexity and verification time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoidlighting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting system is segmented into multiple independent light sources (first light source, second light source, third light source) that can be controlled separately. Each light source creates a specific light configuration (direct illumination, angled illumination, dark field illumination) that can be selectively activated based on the mark type and verification requirements, reducing the need for a single complex lighting system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects and switches between different light configurations based on real-time detection of mark characteristics. The controller automatically adjusts which light sources are active based on the detected mark type, orientation, and quality metrics, making the lighting system adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If multiple light configurations are sequentially tested to find the best verification result, then verification accuracy is improved, but verification time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of mark characteristics (mark type, orientation, contrast) before initiating the full verification sequence. Based on this preliminary analysis, the system pre-determines which light configurations are most likely to yield successful verification, allowing it to skip unnecessary lighting configurations and reduce overall verification time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the quality metrics of captured images during verification and uses this feedback to determine when to stop testing light configurations. Once a configuration achieves sufficient verification accuracy (passing the verification test), the system terminates the sequence early rather than exhaustively testing all possible configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If automatic selection of best light configuration is implemented, then verification efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis and self-selection of optimal lighting configurations based on automated detection of mark characteristics. The controller independently analyzes captured images, determines mark properties, and selects appropriate light configurations without requiring external manual intervention or complex user input, reducing operational complexity while maintaining high efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enables rapid and accurate verification of Data Matrix marks by automatically selecting optimal lighting configurations, reducing the time to achieve a passing grade and providing comprehensive reports on mark quality and readability, thus supporting consistent and efficient Data Matrix mark verification across different environments.

Implementation Method 1

The plurality of light sources can comprise light emitting diodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight Emitting Diode: Light Emitting Diode

Implementation Method 2

illuminating a component via a beamsplitter. The beamsplitter can comprise at least three distinct light reflection zones

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP2168074B1Systems, devices, and/or methods for managing data matrix lighting
Publication Date: 2013.10.30 OMRON MICROSCAN SYSTEMS INC
  • EP2168074B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2168074B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2168074B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Certain exemplary embodiments can provide a method, which can comprise causing a report to be automatically generated. The report can be indicative of a result of a read of a mark. The result can be automatically determined to pass a verification test. The verification test can be performed on an image obtained via an imaging system.