Automated Data Model Anomaly Resolution for Code Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The digital transformation efforts are hindered by the shortage of software developers, inefficiencies in the software development process, and the challenges of maintaining and upgrading legacy software applications, which are prone to security vulnerabilities and difficult to migrate to cloud environments.

Innovation Solution

A system that automatically generates code from a data model, analyzing it for anomalies and improving its quality before generating a full enterprise software application, including data access layers, APIs, UI, and documentation, allowing for rapid regeneration of applications in response to database changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If software applications are built manually by developers, then code quality and customization are improved, but development time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode qualityVSAvoiddevelopment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the data model to detect anomalies, normalization issues, and structural problems before code generation begins. This preliminary action ensures that the generated code is based on a corrected, optimized data model, maintaining high code quality while accelerating the overall development process by preventing manual debugging and refactoring later

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects and corrects data model anomalies, applies normalization rules, and generates complete software applications without requiring manual intervention for each task. The automated system serves itself by performing analysis, correction, and code generation functions that would otherwise require skilled developers, thereby reducing development time while maintaining quality standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If developers manually maintain and upgrade legacy software, then code accuracy and security are improved, but the risk of errors and vulnerability to security threats increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode accuracyVSAvoidsecurity vulnerabilities
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical processes of code review, security auditing, and vulnerability assessment with automated computational analysis. The automated system systematically examines the data model and generated code for security issues, ensuring consistent application of security best practices without human error or oversight, thereby reducing security vulnerabilities while maintaining code accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the generated code is automatically analyzed for security vulnerabilities and anomalies. This feedback mechanism allows the system to detect and correct security issues before deployment, ensuring high reliability while minimizing security risks through automated monitoring and correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex data models are used to represent real-world entities, then data expressiveness and functionality are improved, but the complexity of the data model increases making it harder to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata expressivenessVSAvoiddata model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically adjusts parameters of the data model such as normalization level, relationship cardinality, and entity granularity based on the detected anomalies and quality metrics. By dynamically changing these parameters, the system optimizes the balance between data expressiveness and model complexity, ensuring the model is sufficiently complex to represent real-world entities accurately while remaining maintainable through automated quality control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If manual code generation from data models is performed, then code quality control is improved, but the productivity and speed of application development decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode qualityVSAvoiddevelopment speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing data models, detecting anomalies, applying corrections, and generating code without requiring manual quality control interventions. This automated self-service approach maintains high code quality through systematic analysis while dramatically increasing development speed by eliminating manual review and editing steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary quality control actions by analyzing the data model for anomalies and correcting issues before code generation. This preliminary action ensures high code quality is achieved automatically, allowing rapid development without sacrificing quality control, as the system has already prepared an optimized, anomaly-free data model for code generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11314489B1Automated authoring of software solutions by first analyzing and resolving anomalies in a data model
Publication Date: 2022.04.26 BYGGR INC
  • US11314489B1 patent drawing
  • US11314489B1 patent drawing
  • US11314489B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Before generating code from an abstract model of a data store, the model is first analyzed to detect normalization, rationalization, naming conventions, structure conventions, and other anomalies. The analysis is scored, and the score may be weighted. The analysis also suggests scripted solutions for resolving the discovered anomalies. A developer may then choose to implement one or more of the suggested solutions prior to code generation. The score may be compared to a threshold and result used to gate subsequent actions. For example, generation of code from the abstract model may be prevented until such time as anomalies are sufficiently addressed so that the score meets a minimum threshold score.