Data Packet Header Processing Mode Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In packet-oriented communication networks, all network nodes process data packets extensively, leading to unnecessary energy consumption, as they perform complex signal processing to evaluate destination addresses, even though only the intended receiver node needs to fully process the packet.

Innovation Solution

Implementing separate transmission and reception modes for data packet headers and payloads, using a simpler mode for headers to reduce processing complexity and energy consumption, while reserving more complex processing for intended receiver nodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all network nodes process the entire data packet with complex signal processing, then the destination address can be evaluated at the data link layer, but energy consumption increases unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedestination address evaluationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data packet into two distinct parts: a header processed with a first (simpler) mode and a payload processed with a second (complex) mode. This segmentation allows receiving nodes to process only the header to evaluate destination addresses, avoiding unnecessary processing of the entire packet by nodes that are not the intended recipients.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing qualities to different parts of the data packet. The header receives simplified processing with fewer processing steps, while the payload receives full complex processing only at the intended destination node. This local differentiation of processing quality enables energy savings at intermediate nodes while maintaining reliable destination address evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If complex signal processing is performed on the entire data packet, then complete information is available for further processing, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation availabilityVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the data packet processing into two segments: header processing using a first mode with fewer processing steps and payload processing using a second mode with more processing steps. This segmentation ensures that essential control information in the header is processed efficiently by all nodes, while complete information availability for the payload is maintained only at the destination node.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different processing complexities are applied locally to different packet components. The header is processed with simplified algorithms suitable for all receiving nodes, while the payload receives full complex processing only at the intended destination. This local quality differentiation reduces overall processing complexity while maintaining necessary information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If uniform processing mode is used for header and payload, then processing is consistent, but energy efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing consistencyVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality differentiation by applying a first processing mode to the header and a second processing mode to the payload. The header processing mode is designed with fewer processing steps for energy efficiency, while the payload processing mode provides complete processing capability. This approach maintains processing consistency within each mode while improving overall energy efficiency through mode differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic processing mode selection based on the data packet component being processed. Receiving nodes dynamically switch between first mode (for header/destination address evaluation) and second mode (for payload processing at destination). This dynamic adaptation enables energy-efficient operation at intermediate nodes while ensuring complete processing at the destination node.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10367923B2Method for processing a data packet
Publication Date: 2019.07.30 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US10367923B2 patent drawing
  • US10367923B2 patent drawing
  • US10367923B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for processing at least one data packet (78, 156) which comprises a first header (82, 158) and a payload (100, 160), wherein the first header (82, 158) is processed by a first mode and the payload (100, 160) is processed by a second mode, wherein a number of processing steps (172, 174) for carrying out the second mode is greater than a number of processing steps (168, 170) for carrying out the first mode, the two modes being performed separately from one another.