Data Packet Origin Validation via Nested Confidence Layers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data item communication technologies fail to efficiently validate the origin of data items, leading to illicitly altered data items being inaccurately registered as valid in distributed blockchain databases.

Innovation Solution

The system integrates origin information associated with the data item into the data packet, using headers to represent the validity of this information. This includes adding confidence layers to the data packet, with a zero-confidence layer at the validation server ensuring that received information is verified before processing or transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If only hash value is evaluated during data item validation, then validation process is simple and fast, but illicitly altered data items can be incorrectly registered as valid

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata item validation accuracyVSAvoidvalidation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation process is segmented into multiple independent validation layers: origin information validation (checking device identifiers, IP addresses, timestamps), hash value validation (verifying data integrity), and confidence layer validation (assessing the reliability of validation results). Each layer operates independently and contributes to the overall validation decision, preventing single-point failures and ensuring comprehensive data verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system employs a nested structure where multiple validation layers are contained within each other. The origin information validation layer is nested within the data packet, which itself contains the hash value validation, which is in turn nested within the confidence layer validation. This nested arrangement allows systematic verification of multiple validation levels without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If origin information is added to data packets, then data item traceability and security are improved, but data packet size and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata item origin validationVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Origin information is added selectively rather than universally. The system evaluates the risk level of each data transmission and only attaches origin information validation headers when necessary. For high-risk transmissions, comprehensive origin information including device identifiers, IP addresses, and timestamps is added. For low-risk transmissions, minimal or no origin information is attached, maintaining processing efficiency while ensuring security where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial validation by validating only the necessary origin information fields rather than all possible fields. The confidence layer validation mechanism allows the system to accept partial validation results when sufficient to ensure security, avoiding excessive validation overhead. The validation process can be adjusted to validate only critical fields such as device identifier and timestamp when they are sufficient to prevent illicit data circulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple validation layers are implemented, then false positive rate decreases, but computational load and validation time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidation result accuracyVSAvoidvalidation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Origin information validation is performed in advance before the main data processing begins. By validating the origin information (device identifiers, IP addresses, timestamps) upfront and attaching confidence layers to authenticated data packets, the system ensures that subsequent processing steps can proceed more quickly without needing to re-validate origin information. This preliminary validation action prevents time-consuming re-validation and reduces overall processing time despite multiple validation layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system incorporates feedback mechanisms where validation results are fed back into the processing system. When origin information validation succeeds and a confidence layer is attached, the validated status is fed back to subsequent processing stages, allowing them to proceed with confidence without repeating validation. This feedback loop eliminates redundant validation operations and significantly reduces total processing time despite the multi-layered validation architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250119404A1System and method for validating origin information of a data item
Publication Date: 2025.04.10 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US20250119404A1 patent drawing
  • US20250119404A1 patent drawing
  • US20250119404A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for validating the origin information of a data item accesses a data packet that indicates a request to transfer a data item. The data packet is appended with a first header and a second header. The first header comprises information about the sender of the data packet. The second header comprises information about a user device from which the data packet has originated. The system compares the information about the sender of the data packet with previously provided user information and determines that the user information corresponds to the information about the sender. The system communicates a request that indicates whether the information about the user device is valid and receives a message that indicates the information about the user device is valid. In response, the system communicates a message that comprises the data packet and instructions that, upon execution, cause the data packet to be transferred.