Data Source Reputation Scoring for Adversarial Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cybersecurity solutions lack the ability to effectively manage and validate data provenance in adversarial environments, leading to inadequate risk management and model errors due to insufficient contextual data and untracked inconsistencies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing a cloud computing platform with a reputation relationship graph and data quality analysis to assess data sources, providing reputation scoring and automated recommendations based on metadata and quality metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If collaborative data sets are compiled to improve risk management, then data completeness is improved, but data reliability deteriorates due to untracked inconsistencies and compromised sources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoiddata reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring data quality metrics and updating reputation scores based on observed data consistency and source reliability. This closed-loop approach allows the system to adapt to changing data quality conditions and maintain reliability while accumulating collaborative data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary reputation scoring system that acts as a mediator between multiple data sources and the risk management system. This intermediary layer validates and weights data from different sources, resolving inconsistencies before data is used for risk analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If external scan information is used to characterize entities, then data collection is simplified, but measurement precision deteriorates due to lack of contextual values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata collection simplicityVSAvoidentity characterization precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges external scan information with internal contextual data from multiple sources to create a comprehensive entity characterization. This combination preserves the simplicity of external scanning while enriching the results with contextual values from collaborative data sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The risk intelligence platform serves multiple functions: it collects external scan data, validates it against internal data, contextualizes findings, and generates comprehensive risk assessments. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate systems for data collection and analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If data quality analysis is performed on all ingested data, then data reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata quality assuranceVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial data quality analysis by focusing validation efforts on high-risk data sources and critical data fields. Rather than uniformly analyzing all data, the reputation scoring system prioritizes validation based on source reliability and data importance, reducing overall processing time while maintaining quality assurance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250373660A1Detection and mitigation of data compromises in adversarial environments
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 QOMPLX INC
  • US20250373660A1 patent drawing
  • US20250373660A1 patent drawing
  • US20250373660A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Detection and mitigation of data source compromises in an adversarial information environment, featuring the ability to scan for, ingest and process, and then use relational, wide column, and graph stores for capturing entity data, their relationships, and actions associated with them. Metadata is gathered and linked to the ingested data, which provides a broader contextual view of the environment leading up to and during an event of interest. Data quality analysis is conducted as data is ingested in order to identify if a data source may be compromised. The results are used to manage the reputation of the contributing data sources.