Data Retention Rule Generator for Compliance Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity and cost of managing electronic data in IT systems, particularly in retaining information for compliance with legal and business requirements, pose challenges in determining appropriate retention periods and managing data lifecycle effectively.

Innovation Solution

A data retention rule generator system that maps organizational attributes, purpose of data, and legal entities to determine applicable retention rules, integrating these factors into the information lifecycle management process to identify time frames for data entities, and allowing for modification based on secondary purposes and legal retention periods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If data is retained for longer periods to comply with legal and business requirements, then compliance reliability is improved, but storage costs and management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance reliabilityVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments data into different categories based on retention requirements (primary purpose data, secondary purpose data, legally required data) and applies different retention rules to each segment. This allows the system to manage complex retention requirements by breaking them down into manageable groups with distinct policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic retention periods that can be adjusted based on various factors. The system determines retention rules that may change over time or based on conditions, allowing flexibility in managing data retention while maintaining compliance with legal and business requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If data retention periods are extended to meet legal requirements, then legal compliance is improved, but storage costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelegal complianceVSAvoidstorage costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the data that legally requires extended retention from the overall data set. By identifying and separating legally required data from other data, the system maintains necessary compliance while avoiding unnecessary storage costs for data that does not require long-term retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the retention parameter (time period) based on the specific category of data and applicable legal requirements. Different data categories have different retention periods, allowing the system to optimize storage costs by not uniformly retaining all data for the maximum possible period.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If multiple retention rules are applied to different data categories, then compliance accuracy is improved, but rule determination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance accuracyVSAvoidrule determination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary classification of data into categories with specific retention requirements before applying retention rules. By pre-organizing data based on its retention needs, the system simplifies the subsequent application of retention rules and reduces the complexity of determining which rules apply to which data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary classification layer that maps data to appropriate retention rules. This intermediary step categorizes data based on characteristics such as primary/secondary purpose and legal requirements, making the rule determination process more systematic and less complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10409790B2Data retention rule generator
Publication Date: 2019.09.10 SAP SE
  • US10409790B2 patent drawing
  • US10409790B2 patent drawing
  • US10409790B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of systems and methods to determine data retention rules for data entities are described herein. In one aspect, the data entities are obtained. Usage statuses of the data entities are determined. One or more purpose of data corresponding to the one or more data entities is received. Further, legal entities corresponding to the one or more data entities are identified based on line organization attributes and the usage statuses. Process object attributes associated with the one or more data entities are identified based on the legal entities. Retention rules for the one or more data entities are determined based on the one or more purpose of data, the legal entities and the process object attributes.