Data Structure Validation via Signature Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Data structures in data warehouses often become outdated or errant due to changes, leading to errors in operations and results, as existing methods fail to effectively validate the synchronization of data structures across different states and intervals.

Innovation Solution

A signature-based validation system generates unique identifiers for each data structure state at predetermined intervals, using a validation engine to compare these signatures and ensure data structures are in sync, thereby preventing reliance on out-of-sync or errant data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If data structures are updated frequently to reflect new data and changes, then data currency is improved, but the risk of synchronization errors between parent and child data structures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata currencyVSAvoidsynchronization accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring data structure changes through validation engines that compare parent and child data structures. When discrepancies are detected, the system generates notifications and corrective actions, creating a closed-loop control mechanism that maintains synchronization accuracy while allowing frequent updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The validation engine performs preliminary validation checks before data structure updates are fully applied. By pre-identifying potential synchronization issues and addressing them proactively, the system prevents errors from propagating while maintaining the ability to update data structures frequently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive validation of all data structures is performed continuously, then data integrity is improved, but system complexity and computational overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is segmented into modular validation engines that operate independently on specific data structures or data types. This modular architecture allows comprehensive validation to be distributed across multiple independent components, reducing the complexity of any single validation unit while maintaining overall system thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies validation at selective intervals and focuses on critical data structures rather than continuously validating every single data element. This partial validation approach maintains data integrity for key structures while reducing overall system complexity and computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple copies of data structures are maintained for redundancy, then data availability is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring synchronization errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoiderror detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The validation engine provides feedback mechanisms that actively compare multiple data structure copies and highlight discrepancies. This feedback loop transforms the undetectable complexity of multiple copies into a manageable monitoring system that automatically identifies synchronization errors across redundant structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The validation engine acts as an intermediary that mediates between multiple data structure copies. It introduces a standardized comparison interface that simplifies the detection of synchronization errors by providing a unified method to validate relationships between parent and child structures across all copies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If data structures are validated at every operation, then error prevention is improved, but processing speed and operational efficiency decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror preventionVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Validation is performed periodically at predetermined intervals and at key transition points rather than at every single operation. This periodic validation maintains error prevention capabilities while allowing normal operations to proceed without continuous validation overhead, thus preserving operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

Critical validations are performed preliminarily before operations that are most susceptible to errors. By placing validation checks strategically before high-risk operations rather than at every step, the system prevents errors where they matter most while minimizing the impact on overall processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11068466B2Systems and methods for use in data structure validation
Publication Date: 2021.07.20 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US11068466B2 patent drawing
  • US11068466B2 patent drawing
  • US11068466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for validating data structures includes generating and storing, at each of multiple intervals, a signature for each of multiple data structures, including a parent data structure and a child data structure. The method also includes, in response to a request to validate the child data structure, retrieving active state signatures of the parent and child data structures, and comparing the active state signatures. The method further includes, when the active state signatures are inconsistent, comparing the active state signature of the child data structure to a first prior state signature of the parent data structure; and when the active state signature of the child data structure is consistent with the first prior state signature of the parent data structure, notifying a user that the child data structure is a match for the parent data structure but out of sync therewith.