Data Element Sorting via Two-Stage Influence Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large communication systems, efficiently sorting and prioritizing data elements based on their influence levels for effective data processing is challenging due to the vast amount of data and the complexity of determining importance, which often requires significant computational resources and human judgment.

Innovation Solution

A method that evaluates data elements using two types of usage, sorting a subset of critical data elements based on their influence levels, and providing them for processing, thereby reducing computational resources and effort by focusing on the most important data elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all data elements are processed and sorted using comprehensive evaluation methods, then the accuracy of importance assessment is improved, but the computational resources and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimportance assessment accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data element processing into multiple stages: initial filtering to identify candidate elements, detailed evaluation of only candidates, and hierarchical sorting. This segmentation allows comprehensive assessment to be applied selectively rather than uniformly to all data elements, reducing overall computational resources while maintaining assessment accuracy for critical elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different evaluation depths and methods to different data elements based on their characteristics and importance potential. High-priority candidates receive detailed multi-criteria evaluation, while lower-priority elements receive simplified assessment, creating local quality variations in processing intensity that optimize the balance between accuracy and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If comprehensive evaluation of all data elements is performed, then the reliability of data prioritization is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata prioritization reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary filtering and candidate identification before detailed evaluation, using quick initial assessments to narrow down the dataset. This preliminary action ensures that time-consuming comprehensive evaluations are applied only to elements that will ultimately require prioritization, maintaining reliability while reducing total processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies full comprehensive evaluation to only the necessary subset of candidate data elements rather than all elements, using partial action on the remaining elements. This approach achieves sufficient prioritization reliability for critical elements without the excessive time cost of evaluating every single data element in detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If human judgment is used to assign importance levels to data elements, then the accuracy of influence assessment is improved, but the complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinfluence level accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces automated evaluation algorithms and computational models as intermediaries between raw data elements and final importance assignments. These intermediaries systematically assess multiple criteria and generate prioritization recommendations, reducing the need for direct human judgment while maintaining accuracy through structured, repeatable evaluation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual human judgment mechanisms with automated computational systems that evaluate data elements based on predefined criteria and algorithms. This substitution reduces system complexity by eliminating the need for human expert involvement while maintaining or improving assessment accuracy through consistent, objective evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of information

If all data elements are sorted and processed, then the completeness of data utilization is improved, but the productivity of the system decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata utilization completenessVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the most critical data elements for prioritization while identifying and setting aside less important elements. This extraction approach ensures that essential information is fully utilized and processed with appropriate detail, while non-critical elements are handled more efficiently, maintaining overall data utilization completeness without sacrificing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11487770B2Sorting data elements of a given set of data elements
Publication Date: 2022.11.01 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11487770B2 patent drawing
  • US11487770B2 patent drawing
  • US11487770B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer implemented method is used for sorting data elements of a given set. The method includes performing an evaluation of a first type of usage of each data element. The method includes determining a set of data element candidates dependent on the evaluation of the first type of usage. The method includes performing an evaluation of a second type of usage of each data element of the set of data element candidates. The method includes sorting the data elements of the set of data element candidates dependent on the evaluation of the second type of usage of each data element of the set of data element candidates. The method includes providing the sorted data elements of the set of data element candidates, and in response, receiving a request for a data processing based on the provided sorted data elements of the set of data element candidates.