Data Sorting and Rating System with Visual Refresh Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Companies face challenges in deciding which software features or products to invest in, as traditional methods of seeking user feedback are subjective, time-consuming, and yield imprecise results, potentially leading to costly mistakes.

Innovation Solution

A data sorting and rating system that allows users to allocate votes for prioritizing features or products, with visual indicators to reflect changes in sorting order, enabling users to manually re-sort data when necessary, ensuring accurate representation of user preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional survey methods are used to gather user feedback, then user opinions can be obtained, but the results are subjective, time-consuming, and imprecise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of user feedbackVSAvoidtime to gather feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical survey methods (manual questionnaires, interviews) with an automated electronic system that uses software interfaces, databases, and automated notification mechanisms to collect, process, and analyze user feedback, thereby improving precision while reducing time investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables users to automatically provide feedback through structured forms and rating mechanisms embedded in the software interface, eliminating the need for manual data collection and processing by researchers or analysts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If data is manually sorted and updated, then sorting accuracy can be maintained, but the process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting accuracyVSAvoiddata sorting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual data sorting operations with automated computational algorithms that continuously process and sort feedback data based on predefined criteria, maintaining high sorting accuracy while dramatically improving processing speed and efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous automated sorting and updating of feedback data, eliminating interruptions and manual re-sorting operations, thereby maintaining consistent accuracy while improving overall productivity through uninterrupted processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of information

If visual indicators are added to show sorting status, then data transparency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata sorting status visibilityVSAvoidsystem interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses color-coded visual indicators (such as colored bars, highlights, or icons) to represent different sorting statuses and feedback metrics, providing clear information about data state without requiring complex interface elements or additional user education

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Data Source

PatentUS11615383B2Data sorting and rating system
Publication Date: 2023.03.28 SALESFORCE INC
  • US11615383B2 patent drawing
  • US11615383B2 patent drawing
  • US11615383B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are system, method, and computer program product embodiments providing a data sorting and rating system. An embodiment operates by detecting a user modification of a particular value of a sorted plurality of values of a column displayed in a visual interface including a sorting visual indicator indicating that the plurality of values are sorted. It is determined that the values are no longer sorted after the user modification. The sorting visual indicator is replaced with a refresh visual indicator based on the determination that the plurality of values are no longer sorted. The values including the user modification are re-sorted based on a selection of the refresh visual indicator. The re-sorted plurality of values including the user modification of the particular value are provided for display in the visual interface.