Post-Modeling Data Visualization with Key Feature Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current data visualization methods do not provide adequate insights into specific portions of data selected by users, failing to offer evaluations or detailed analyses of user-selected data groups.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for post-modeling data visualization and analysis that identifies three or fewer key model features from a user-selected data group, using techniques like Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanation (LIME) to ascertain representative records, and presents these in a second visualization plot for deeper analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If data visualization presents comprehensive data and relationships, then data insights are improved, but visualization complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata insightsVSAvoidvisualization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data visualization into two distinct plots: a first plot displaying comprehensive training dataset relationships, and a second plot displaying selected data group details with key model features. This segmentation allows users to navigate from overall data patterns to specific insights without overwhelming complexity in a single visualization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing detailed analysis of specific data groups (local) while maintaining overview of the entire training dataset (global). The second plot focuses on key model features and representative records for selected data groups, providing localized depth without sacrificing overall context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If the system analyzes all data groups, then analysis completeness is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-identifying key model features and pre-processing data groups before user interaction. The first visualization establishes baseline understanding of data relationships, and when users select specific data groups, the system has already prepared the framework for detailed analysis, reducing real-time processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by analyzing only selected data groups rather than all data groups simultaneously. The system identifies three or fewer key model features for the selected data group, providing sufficient analysis depth without the computational burden of processing every data group in the entire training set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the system identifies multiple key model features, then feature representation accuracy is improved, but visualization clarity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature representation accuracyVSAvoidvisualization clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing detailed analysis of specific data groups (local) while maintaining overview of the entire training dataset (global). The second plot focuses on key model features and representative records for selected data groups, providing localized depth without sacrificing overall context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12293438B2Visualize data and significant records based on relationship with the model
Publication Date: 2025.05.06 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12293438B2 patent drawing
  • US12293438B2 patent drawing
  • US12293438B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an approach for post-modeling data visualization and analysis, a processor presents a first visualization of a training dataset in a first plot. Responsive to receiving a selection of a data group of the training dataset to analyze, a processor identifies three or fewer key model features of the data group of the training dataset. A processor ascertains a representative record of each key model feature of the three or fewer key model features using a Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanation technique. A processor presents a second visualization of the three or fewer key model features and the representative record of each key model feature in a second plot.