Database Charge Value Optimization via ML

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for managing transaction records in databases face challenges in optimizing changes to values used for processing these records, leading to delays and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a records management and processing system that applies rules to identify and tag records for further attention, utilizes an optimization engine to adjust values based on historical data and market analysis, and employs a workflow engine to prioritize and process records accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review and adjustment of charge values is performed, then accuracy of payment processing is improved, but processing time and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of charge value processingVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-adjustment of charge values through machine learning models that analyze historical data, market conditions, and transaction patterns to autonomously optimize pricing without manual intervention, thereby maintaining accuracy while reducing processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where processing results, customer responses, and market data are fed back into the machine learning models to dynamically adjust charge values, enabling real-time optimization without manual review while maintaining high accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If frequent adjustments to charge values are made to optimize pricing, then market competitiveness is improved, but system stability and processing reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarket responsivenessVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic charge value adjustment through machine learning models that continuously adapt to market conditions while maintaining stability through controlled change parameters, allowing the system to be both market-responsive and stable simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system carefully manages parameter changes in charge values by using machine learning to determine optimal adjustment magnitudes and frequencies, ensuring that changes are sufficient to maintain competitiveness but controlled enough to preserve system stability and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If complex optimization algorithms are implemented to adjust charge values, then processing efficiency is improved, but system complexity and implementation costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization system is segmented into modular machine learning components that can be independently deployed and managed, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high processing efficiency through distributed computation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary layers between complex optimization algorithms and the core processing system, including abstraction layers and standardized interfaces that hide algorithmic complexity while preserving efficiency benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250139628A1Methods and systems for optimizing charge values affecting the processing of database records
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 ENSEMBLE RCM LLC
  • US20250139628A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139628A1 patent drawing
  • US20250139628A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments are directed to adjusting values used for processing of database records. According to one embodiment, how certain database records are processed can be evaluated and certain predefined values used in the processing of those certain records can be adjusted. Upon request, and/or upon the occurrence of certain conditions of events, records of the database can be reviewed and values, e.g., predefined charge values associated with certain services indicated in the records, used to process the records can be adjusted. Generally speaking, an optimization engine can review the records, identify records for evaluation, e.g., records having total amounts limited to a predefined maximum and other records that are consistently below a contractual maximum or too low in general, evaluate those records, and possibly adjust the predefined maximum values based on the evaluation.