Database Clustering via Metadata Precision Factors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional relational database management systems (RDBMS) face inefficiencies in query execution due to inflexible data partitioning techniques and high computational costs, especially when handling large volumes of dynamic data and changing user requirements, leading to slow query performance and increased overhead.

Innovation Solution

The method involves clustering database records to optimize metadata parameters, allowing for dynamic reorganization of data clusters based on selected metadata parameters and precision factors, which improves query execution efficiency by minimizing the need for decompressing irrelevant data and optimizing cluster quality parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional data partitioning techniques are used to organize databases, then data can be divided into smaller blocks for management, but query execution speed deteriorates due to high computational cost and inability to handle dynamic data changes efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery execution speedVSAvoidcomputational overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic clustering that automatically adapts to changing query patterns and data characteristics. The system continuously monitors query workloads and reorganizes data clusters in real-time without requiring manual intervention or complete re-partitioning, thus maintaining high query execution speed while handling dynamic data changes efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes organizational parameters dynamically by adjusting cluster configurations, metadata structures, and data groupings based on observed query patterns. This allows the database to optimize for different query types (e.g., point queries vs. range queries) without fixed partitioning schemes, reducing computational overhead while maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If data is partitioned into separate groups based on specific query patterns, then query performance improves for those patterns, but flexibility deteriorates when user requirements change significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery performanceVSAvoidflexibility to changing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic clustering system that automatically detects changes in query patterns and data characteristics, then reorganizes clusters accordingly. This eliminates the rigidity of static partitioning while maintaining optimized query performance, as the system adapts its structure to match current user requirements rather than being locked into predetermined groupings

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal clustering mechanism that can handle multiple query types and data patterns simultaneously. The metadata-driven approach allows the same clustering infrastructure to serve diverse query workloads (point queries, range queries, aggregation queries) without requiring specialized partitioning schemes for each query pattern, thus providing both performance and flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If metadata parameters are used to characterize data units and avoid searching individual records, then query processing speed improves, but the complexity of managing and optimizing metadata increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery processing speedVSAvoidmetadata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-organizing clusters that automatically generate and maintain their own metadata structures based on the data they contain and the queries they serve. The system autonomously computes cluster quality parameters, selects appropriate metadata types, and optimizes metadata storage without requiring external intervention, thus improving query processing speed while minimizing metadata management complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from query execution patterns and cluster performance metrics to continuously optimize metadata structures. By monitoring which metadata parameters most effectively prune search spaces and improve query performance, the system automatically adjusts metadata generation strategies, maintaining high query processing speed while managing complexity through data-driven optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If clustering operations are performed to optimize metadata precision factors, then query execution efficiency improves, but the time and resources required for cluster reorganization increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequery execution efficiencyVSAvoidcluster reorganization time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements incremental and on-demand clustering operations that adapt to system workload and resource availability. Rather than performing complete re-clustering operations periodically, the system makes small, targeted adjustments to cluster configurations based on changing query patterns, significantly reducing reorganization time while maintaining query execution efficiency through continuous, lightweight optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8266147B2Methods and systems for database organization
Publication Date: 2012.09.11 KNOWLEDGE GRID LLC
  • US8266147B2 patent drawing
  • US8266147B2 patent drawing
  • US8266147B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A relational database having a plurality of records is organized by using a processing arrangement to perform a clustering operation on the records so as to create a number of clusters. At least one of the clusters is characterized by a selected metadata parameter. The clustering operation is performed to optimize a calculated value of a selected precision factor for the selected metadata parameter. The selected metadata parameter is selected to optimize execution of a database query and the value of the selected precision factor is related to efficiency of execution of the database query.