Database Indexing Using Variant Data Types for O(1) Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing database indexing techniques are not universally efficient and often introduce complexity, failing to achieve optimal performance across various contexts and use cases, particularly in data storage, retrieval, and manipulation operations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a pre-processing operation that encodes record values to facilitate O(1) performance through the use of variant data types and deserializable serialized binary large objects, allowing for efficient indexing and retrieval, independent of the specific database implementation or data structuring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional database indexing techniques are used, then data can be stored and retrieved, but performance degrades to O(N) or linear performance in worst case scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retrieval performanceVSAvoidlookup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-computing and storing index structures (bitmaps, inverted indexes, or dense indexes) before data retrieval operations. These index structures are built in advance during data insertion or update operations, enabling O(1) or O(log N) retrieval performance without degrading to O(N) linear search in worst-case scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified copies of the original data in index structures that are optimized for rapid retrieval. Instead of searching the full data set, the system uses compact index copies (such as bitmap representations or inverted indexes) that enable fast lookup while maintaining the ability to retrieve complete data when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If complex indexing structures are implemented to improve retrieval performance, then lookup speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retrieval performanceVSAvoidindexing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal indexing framework that can adapt to different data types and query patterns without requiring separate complex indexing systems. The same infrastructure supports multiple indexing strategies (bitmap, inverted index, dense index) and can automatically select or switch between them based on the specific use case, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters of the indexing system by using variable-width bitmaps and adaptive index structures that adjust their complexity based on data characteristics. This allows the system to achieve O(1) performance for common operations while keeping the index size and computational complexity manageable through parameter optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If data is organized for efficient retrieval, then lookup performance improves, but data manipulation and update operations become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata retrieval performanceVSAvoiddata manipulation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic indexing where index structures can be efficiently updated alongside data modifications. The system uses incremental update mechanisms that maintain index consistency without requiring complete re-indexing, allowing data manipulation operations to remain straightforward while preserving fast retrieval performance through continuously maintained index structures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11042526B2Systems and/or methods for database storage using binary large objects to guarantee reduced complexity
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11042526B2 patent drawing
  • US11042526B2 patent drawing
  • US11042526B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain example embodiments involve accessing data in a database. At least one key is associated with the data. The data is indexed based on the at least one key. The index provides key-value pairs in which keys in the key-value pairs correspond to the at least one key associated with the data and values in the key-value pairs correspond to deserializable serialized blobs generated to include the data in variant data type format. The variant data type format includes different possible equivalent representations of the data such that the data stored in the blobs is of potentially different structures. Responsive to a request received from a computing device, a database transaction is performed on the data in connection with the index and based on the received request. These techniques can be used in connection with tasks as well as data “per se.” O(1) performance is achievable in some instances.