Database Lock Readiness Monitoring for Clinical Trials

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Clinical trial databases face challenges in ensuring data integrity and readiness for locking, leading to potential data corruption and delayed study milestones due to lack of efficient monitoring and notification systems.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for monitoring the status of a clinical trial database prior to locking, involving a mobile application that generates a mock database lock snapshot, correlates database attributes with readiness metrics, and provides real-time notifications and task assignments to ensure data integrity and readiness for locking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual monitoring and verification of database readiness is performed, then data integrity can be ensured, but time consumption and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and verification of database readiness criteria before the actual database lock operation. Readiness metrics are continuously tracked and evaluated in advance, allowing the system to determine whether the database is ready for locking without performing manual checks at the moment of locking, thus reducing time consumption while maintaining data integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The database system automatically monitors its own readiness status by evaluating predefined criteria against current database state. The system self-verify whether locking conditions are met without requiring external manual intervention, thereby ensuring data integrity while significantly reducing the time required for readiness assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive readiness metrics are implemented, then database locking reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The readiness assessment system is divided into multiple independent readiness metrics, each evaluating a specific aspect of database readiness (e.g., data completeness, quality thresholds, validation rules). This segmentation allows the system to comprehensively assess locking reliability through modular, manageable criteria rather than a monolithic complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The readiness metric evaluation system serves multiple functions: it monitors database state, evaluates readiness criteria, generates notifications, and supports decision-making for database locking. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems for each task, thereby improving locking reliability without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If real-time monitoring and notification systems are deployed, then operational efficiency is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic evaluation of readiness metrics rather than continuous monitoring. The database readiness status is assessed at defined intervals or triggered by specific events (e.g., data entry batches, validation completions), allowing the system to maintain operational efficiency while reducing constant resource consumption associated with continuous real-time monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The notification system provides feedback only when readiness status changes or when specific thresholds are met, rather than continuously communicating database state. This feedback mechanism improves operational efficiency by alerting users only when actionable information is available, while minimizing resource consumption by avoiding unnecessary continuous communication and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11940974B2Database lock
Publication Date: 2024.03.26 OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
  • US11940974B2 patent drawing
  • US11940974B2 patent drawing
  • US11940974B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a storage device, for monitoring the status of a database prior to locking the database. In one aspect, the method comprises receiving a request to generate a mock database, accessing a set of database lock readiness metrics, wherein the set of database lock readiness metrics include one or more attribute values that each specify a value of an attribute of database data that must be satisfied for the database to be locked, correlating information that includes (i) the set of database lock readiness metrics and (ii) database data of the database, and generating a database lock readiness report structure, based on a mock database lock representing a snapshot of the database at a particular point in time, that indicates whether each of the one or more attribute values specified by the set of database lock readiness metrics have been satisfied.