Central Database Machine Learning Models for Proactive Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Centralized database systems face challenges in predicting future issues and resource requirements for entities, limiting their ability to proactively improve customer experiences and optimize resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

The central database system accesses historical data to generate a training set, which is used to train machine-learned models. These models predict future issues and resource requirements based on entity characteristics, allowing the system to proactively perform actions and allocate resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If machine-learned models are used to predict future issues and resource requirements, then the ability to proactively improve customer experiences is enhanced, but the system complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the prediction system into multiple specialized machine-learned models, each trained to predict specific types of future issues (e.g., customer churn, support tickets, resource requirements) based on different historical data patterns. This modular approach improves prediction accuracy for each specific issue type while managing overall system complexity through organized model deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively identifying and addressing predicted future issues before they actually occur. Historical data is analyzed in advance to train models that can forecast customer needs and potential problems, enabling the system to take preventive measures such as allocating resources ahead of time or notifying customers of potential service disruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If historical data is extensively analyzed to train machine-learned models, then prediction precision improves, but the time and computational resources required for training increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction precisionVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively analyzing only the most relevant historical data features and patterns needed for each specific prediction task, rather than processing entire historical datasets. This approach achieves sufficient prediction precision for practical purposes while significantly reducing training time and computational resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes training efficiency by adjusting model parameters such as training batch sizes, learning rates, and data sampling strategies. These parameter changes enable the machine-learned models to achieve high prediction precision with reduced training time by finding optimal balances between model complexity and training resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the system proactively performs actions based on predictions, then customer experience is enhanced, but the risk of incorrect predictions and inappropriate actions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer experienceVSAvoidprediction reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the outcomes of proactive actions are continuously monitored and fed back into the machine-learned models. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from both successful and unsuccessful predictions, gradually improving prediction reliability while maintaining enhanced customer experience through data-driven continuous optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation and confidence assessment before executing proactive actions. Predictions with high confidence scores trigger automated actions, while lower confidence predictions are flagged for human review or alternative handling approaches, balancing customer experience enhancement with prediction reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250094859A1Machine learned resource allocation models for centralized database predictions
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 GUSTO INC
  • US20250094859A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094859A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094859A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A central database system trains and applies machine-learned models based on characteristics of one or more entities associated with the central database system. For instance, the central database system trains a machine-learned model configured to identify issues a target entity is likely to encounter based on training data identifying characteristics of historical entities and issues faced by the historical entities. Likewise, the central database system trains machine-learned models configured to predict actions that entities are likely to take in the future, and resources required to take those actions. The central database system can then perform one or more proactive actions or make one or more recommendations based on the predicted issues, the predicted future actions, and the predicted required resources.