Database Trigger Indicators for Scalable Event Notifications

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing database systems lack efficient mechanisms for triggering event notifications based on updates to database records, leading to potential duplication and inefficient processing of large volumes of data.

Innovation Solution

A database system that includes a first database for records, a second database for trigger indicators, and a hardware processor to process updates, generate logs, and send notifications based on matching trigger indicators, thereby optimizing processing and reducing duplication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the system processes large volumes of data updates, then productivity increases, but processor intensity and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of data updates processed dailyVSAvoidprocessor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the notification generation process into distinct phases: (1) capturing database updates, (2) evaluating triggers against update logs, and (3) generating notifications only when triggers match. This segmentation allows the system to process millions of updates efficiently by not generating notifications for every update, thereby reducing processor intensity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining trigger indicators and storing them in a database before actual updates occur. When updates happen, the system only needs to compare the update log against pre-existing triggers rather than evaluating all possible conditions in real-time, significantly reducing processing complexity while maintaining high throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system generates notifications for all data updates, then notification completeness improves, but duplication and inefficiency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenotification completenessVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by comparing each database update against previously defined trigger indicators stored in the trigger database. Only when the update matches the trigger criteria does the system generate a notification. This feedback mechanism ensures notification completeness for relevant events while eliminating duplication and inefficiency from generating notifications for all updates regardless of relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by generating notifications selectively based on the specific characteristics of each update and its match against trigger indicators. Rather than uniformly processing all updates the same way, the system tailors its response based on the local context of each update, generating notifications only where triggers are satisfied, thus improving efficiency without sacrificing completeness for relevant events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12596701B2Database system for triggering event notifications based on updates to database records
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC
  • US12596701B2 patent drawing
  • US12596701B2 patent drawing
  • US12596701B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A data processing system is disclosed for accessing databases and updated data items and triggering event notifications. The data processing system may comprise a first database including a plurality of records, and a second database including a plurality of trigger indicators. The database system may further include a hardware processor configured to execute computer-executable instructions in order to: receive an update data item; identify a record corresponding to the update data item; cause an update to the record based on information included with the update data item; identify a trigger indicator corresponding to the update to the record; determine that a type of the trigger indicator matches a type of the update to the record; and generate an event notification including information included in the update.